2015
DOI: 10.1109/tbme.2015.2447575
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry for Measurement of Phalangeal Bone Mineral Density on a Slot-Scanning Digital Radiography System

Abstract: We have shown the clinical potential of phalangeal DXA measurements of aBMD and vBMD on a slot-scanning digital radiography system.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(82 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Segmentation errors can significantly impact the BMD calculation and subsequent analyses. However, several reasons drive incorrect segmentation in DXA images and post-analysis [4,5]. Firstly, the use of low-dose X-rays in DXA imaging provides noisy images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Segmentation errors can significantly impact the BMD calculation and subsequent analyses. However, several reasons drive incorrect segmentation in DXA images and post-analysis [4,5]. Firstly, the use of low-dose X-rays in DXA imaging provides noisy images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of these factors lead to significant reduction in bone structure [9]- [11]. In order to diagnose bone, whether it is infected or not, we need to measure bone mineral density [12], [13], there are several techniques to measure bone mineral density, such as X-ray [14], CT scan [15], dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) [16] scan which differ in their quality and radiation dose. We will use DEXA because it has lower radiation dose than CT scan [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More than 20% of people die from fractures that occur from osteoporosis [1]. The medical imaging technology known as dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) can adequately diagnose this disease and is currently considered the gold standard for such diagnoses [2][3][4]. Meanwhile, quantitative computed tomography exists as an alternative method, but it demands a large dose of X-rays and is overpriced.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Careful DXA image analysis and precise BMD calculation support the pinpoint segmentation of soft tissue and bone. On the other hand, imprecise bone and soft tissue segmentation severely affect BMD calculation and subsequent analysis of DXA image [3,4]. Unfortunately, erroneous bone region identification is a widespread problem in femur DXA images for several reasons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%