2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2017.12.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry and Bioimpedance Analysis are Clinically Useful for Measuring Muscle Mass in Kidney Transplant Recipients With Sarcopenia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
21
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, BIA‐derived muscle mass estimation in KTRs is strongly correlated to CT‐based muscle mass estimation. 45 Another limitation is that the FTSTS test score was performed in a smaller sample size as compared with the other muscle parameters. Most likely, the smaller sample size also explains the larger identified odds ratio for patients with low haemoglobin levels of being in the highest quartile of the FTSTS test score as compared with the odds ratios of being in the worst quartile of the other muscle parameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, BIA‐derived muscle mass estimation in KTRs is strongly correlated to CT‐based muscle mass estimation. 45 Another limitation is that the FTSTS test score was performed in a smaller sample size as compared with the other muscle parameters. Most likely, the smaller sample size also explains the larger identified odds ratio for patients with low haemoglobin levels of being in the highest quartile of the FTSTS test score as compared with the odds ratios of being in the worst quartile of the other muscle parameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are considered the gold standards for assessment of muscle mass, but are not often used for nutritional assessment in clinical practice because of the high costs and practical limitations [38,55]. The GLIM therefore recommends using other indirect body composition measures, such as DEXA or BIA [19], and a previous study in RTR, with mostly a healthy BMI, showed that estimations of muscle mass by CT, DEXA and BIA were well-correlated [56]. However, the use of BIA to estimate muscle mass may include errors caused by changes in hydration status and, importantly, may overestimate muscle mass in obesity [57,58].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Yanishi et al, the CT scan is the reference test for muscle mass quantification and its correlation with functional parameters (BIA, DXA) is high. 26 Several parameters exist for the evaluation of muscle mass on CT scan, notably SMI, PMI, and transversal psoas thickness index. 27 We chose the SMI because it is the best scanographic parameter for muscle analysis according to the latest recommendations of the EWGSOP2 (European working group on sarcopenia in older people 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%