Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2009.07.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dual-energy CT angiography of pelvic and lower extremity arteries: dual-energy bone subtraction versus manual bone subtraction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the use of this technique appears to be difficult for small-sized arteries. Dualenergy-based bone removal and calcium removal techniques have been used for lower extremity CTA, but thus far, no study has demonstrated any advantage of dual-energy CTA for peripheral artery applications (79)(80)(81)(82)(83)(84). An increase of the radiation dose, noise and sub-centimeter diameter of the distal peripheral arteries are limitations for dual-energy peripheral CT angiography that may be solved by high-resolution dual-energy acquisitions combined with iterative reconstruction and spectral filtering.…”
Section: Vascular Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the use of this technique appears to be difficult for small-sized arteries. Dualenergy-based bone removal and calcium removal techniques have been used for lower extremity CTA, but thus far, no study has demonstrated any advantage of dual-energy CTA for peripheral artery applications (79)(80)(81)(82)(83)(84). An increase of the radiation dose, noise and sub-centimeter diameter of the distal peripheral arteries are limitations for dual-energy peripheral CT angiography that may be solved by high-resolution dual-energy acquisitions combined with iterative reconstruction and spectral filtering.…”
Section: Vascular Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its usefulness in the examination of the peripheral arteries [41][42][43][44] and the carotid and intracranial arteries [45][46][47][48][49][50] has already been reported. At this time, the dual-energy subtraction method has not yet been applied to the coronary arteries.…”
Section: Future Prospectsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Therefore, MDCTA has limited value in the evaluation of extensively calcified (especially crural) arteries [7] and conventional bone removal needs time-consuming postprocessing [13]. Dual-energy computed tomography angiography (DE-CTA) allows to remove bones and intraluminal plaques from angiographic datasets on the basis of spectral differentiation separating iodine from calcium, ideally generating a true CTA-luminogram [13][14][15][16][17][18]. Accurate and time-effective assessment of even sclerotic lesions in PAOD by consultation of three-dimensionally (3D) reconstructed images would make CT angiography more comparable to MRA and DSA and increase its acceptance in daily routine.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a major drawback of MDCTA is its inability to reliably discriminate between attenuation caused by high intravasal iodine concentration and attenuation caused by calcium. Therefore, MDCTA has limited value in the evaluation of extensively calcified (especially crural) arteries [7] and conventional bone removal needs time-consuming postprocessing [13]. Dual-energy computed tomography angiography (DE-CTA) allows to remove bones and intraluminal plaques from angiographic datasets on the basis of spectral differentiation separating iodine from calcium, ideally generating a true CTA-luminogram [13][14][15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%