Dual embryonic origin of the hyobranchial apparatus in the Mexican axolotl (Ambystoma mexicanum)

Davidian, Asya; Malashichev, Yegor

doi:10.1387/ijdb.130213ym

Cited by 12 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Mapping studies in chick (Evans & Noden, 2006;Noden, 1987) and mouse (Tabler et al, 2017; but see contrary claim by Matsuoka et al, 2005) embryos prove that the cricoid and arytenoid cartilages are, like the tracheal rings caudal to them, derived from lateral mesoderm located adjacent to the occipital somites. This lateral mesoderm also contributes to ventro-medial structures associated with caudal branchial arches (Davidian & Malashichev, 2013;Sefton, Piekarski, & Hanken, 2015).…”

Section: Carmonamentioning

confidence: 99%

Neural crest and the patterning of vertebrate craniofacial muscles

Ziermann

Diogo

Noden

2018

Genesis

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Patterning of craniofacial muscles overtly begins with the activation of lineage-specific markers at precise, evolutionarily conserved locations within prechordal, lateral, and both unsegmented and somitic paraxial mesoderm populations. Although these initial programming events occur without influence of neural crest cells, the subsequent movements and differentiation stages of most head muscles are neural crest-dependent. Incorporating both descriptive and experimental studies, this review examines each stage of myogenesis up through the formation of attachments to their skeletal partners. We present the similarities among developing muscle groups, including comparisons with trunk myogenesis, but emphasize the morphogenetic processes that are unique to each group and sometimes subsets of muscles within a group. These groups include branchial (pharyngeal) arches, which encompass both those with clear homologues in all vertebrate classes and those unique to one, for example, mammalian facial muscles, and also extraocular, laryngeal, tongue, and neck muscles. The presence of several distinct processes underlying neural crest:myoblast/myocyte interactions and behaviors is not surprising, given the wide range of both quantitative and qualitative variations in craniofacial muscle organization achieved during vertebrate evolution.

show abstract

Section: Carmonamentioning

confidence: 99%

Neural crest and the patterning of vertebrate craniofacial muscles

Ziermann

Diogo

Noden

2018

Genesis

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Interestingly, skeletal elements may develop either from NC or mesoderm, and there is a possibility for compensatory replacement of one tissue with the other in evolution (Davidian and Malashichev, 2013;Hall and Gillis, 2013), and development (Schneider, 1999;Murdoch et al, 2012). A most striking example is development of basibranchial elements of the hyobranchial apparatus from mesoderm in amphibians (Davidian and Malashichev, 2013), while it is originating from NC in fish (Schilling and Kimmel, 1994;Kague et al, 2012;Mongera et al, 2013) and amniotes (Chai et al, 2000;Matsuoka et al, 2005;Gross and Hanken, 2008).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A most striking example is development of basibranchial elements of the hyobranchial apparatus from mesoderm in amphibians (Davidian and Malashichev, 2013), while it is originating from NC in fish (Schilling and Kimmel, 1994;Kague et al, 2012;Mongera et al, 2013) and amniotes (Chai et al, 2000;Matsuoka et al, 2005;Gross and Hanken, 2008). This represents a special difficulty in interpreting homologies and predicting the embryonic origin of a particular skeletal element.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This traditional view has been challenged in recent years with the development of a number of transgenic model systems, demonstrating explicitly that the NC-mesoderm interface and the intramembranous bone−endochondral bone division do not coincide in the skull and in the shoulder girdle (Matsuoka et al, 2005;Valasek et al, 2010;Davidian and Malashichev, 2013) -see Fig. 1 for a schematic mapping.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In contrast, there is no evidence for a NC contribution to the cleithrum (dermal shoulder girdle) in zebrafish, suggesting a mesodermal origin (Kague et al, 2012). Most recently, the cartilaginous viscerocranium of amphibians, which for a long time was considered as originating exclusively from the hyoid and pharyngeal streams of the head NC, has been shown to be of dual origin, with some midline elements developing from the lateral plate head mesoderm in contrast to NC-derived homologous structures of fish, birds, and mammals (Davidian and Malashichev, 2013). Hence, there is no reason anymore to assume that neural crest and mesoderm have different skeletogenic capacities in that they preferably form skeletal elements of one type, and vice versa, that endochondral or intramembranous mode of development of a skeletal element is a reliable marker of its embryonic origin.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Neural crest contribution to the avian shoulder girdle and implications to girdle evolution in vertebrates

Ponomartsev

Valášek

Patel

et al. 2017

BioComm

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Neural crest (NC) is an established source for many endochondral and intramembranous bones in the skull and postcranial skeleton in vertebrates. Neural crest cells also contribute to the trapezius/cleidohyoideus muscle attachment sites on the shoulder girdle of the mouse, where they are found in the scapula, clavicle, and sternum. In the avian shoulder girdle, NC cells from the level of the first two cranial−most somites were only found so far in the clavicle, while in the axolotl, the NC contribution to the shoulder girdle was not found at all. In this study we aimed to determine whether NC cells caudal to the level of the second somite contribute to the cartilaginous shoulder girdle in birds and to analyse the phylogenetic distribution of NC cells in the vertebrate shoulder girdle. Homotopic quail to chick embryos and GFP+ to white chick embryos transplantations of the neural tube including presumptive NC, as well as immunohistochemical detection of NC markers, such as HNK-1 and PDGFRα revealed no contribution of NC cells from somite levels 3−27 to the skeletal elements of the shoulder girdle, including, but not restricting to muscle attachment sites, despite abundance of other NC derivatives. Thus, in birds, NC does not contribute to the formation of the cartilaginous shoulder girdle. The negative result is discussed in a broad evolutionary aspect. It supports the notion of the uniqueness of NC contribution to the variety of endochondral bones in mice (or mammals). In other vertebrates, including birds, only the cells of the cranial NC seem to migrate to the shoulder girdle and contribute to the intramembranous clavicles and/or interclavicle. We critically evaluate the existing hypotheses on evolution of NC contribution to the shoulder girdle in vertebrates.

show abstract

Development of the skull and pectoral girdle in Siberian sturgeon,Acipenser baerii, and Russian sturgeon,Acipenser gueldenstaedtii(Acipenseriformes: Acipenseridae)

Warth

Hilton

Naumann

et al. 2017

Journal of Morphology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The head is considered the major novelty of the vertebrates and directly linked to their evolutionary success. Its form and development as well as its function, for example in feeding, is of major interest for evolutionary biologists. In this study, we describe the skeletal development of the cranium and pectoral girdle in Siberian (Acipenser baerii) and Russian sturgeon (A. gueldenstaedtii), two species that are commonly farmed in aquaculture and increasingly important in developmental studies. This study comprises the development of the neuro-, viscero- and dermatocranium and the dermal and chondral components of the pectoral girdle, from first condensation of chondrocytes in prehatchlings to the early juvenile stage and reveals a clear pattern in formation. The otic capsules, the parachordal cartilages, and the trabeculae cranii are the first centers of chondrification, at 8.4mm TL. These are followed by the mandibular, then the hyoid, and later the branchial arches. Teeth form early on the dentary, dermopalatine, and palatopterygoid, and then appear later in the buccal cavity as dorsal and ventral toothplates. With ongoing chondrification in the neurocranium a capsule around the brain and a strong rostrum are formed. Dermal ossifications start to form before closure of the dorsal neurocranial fenestrae. Perichondral ossification of cartilage bones occurs much later in ontogeny. Our results contribute data bearing on the homology of elements such as the lateral rostral canal bone that we regard homologous to the antorbital of other actinopterygians based on its sequence of formation, position and form. We further raise doubts on the homology of the posterior ceratobranchial among Actinopteri based on the formation of the hyoid arch elements. We also investigate the basibranchials and the closely associated unidentified gill-arch elements and show that they are not homologous. J. Morphol. 278:418-442, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

show abstract

Dual embryonic origin of the hyobranchial apparatus in the Mexican axolotl (Ambystoma mexicanum)

Cited by 12 publications

References 29 publications

Neural crest and the patterning of vertebrate craniofacial muscles

Neural crest and the patterning of vertebrate craniofacial muscles

Neural crest contribution to the avian shoulder girdle and implications to girdle evolution in vertebrates

Development of the skull and pectoral girdle in Siberian sturgeon,Acipenser baerii, and Russian sturgeon,Acipenser gueldenstaedtii(Acipenseriformes: Acipenseridae)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About