2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10118-022-2736-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dual Effects of Interfacial Interaction and Geometric Constraints on Structural Formation of Poly(butylene terephthalate) Nanorods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 40 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To this end, we investigate the thin-film crystallization of PBT from the amorphous state. Usually, polymer thin films with a thickness of less than ∼1 μm can impose a significantly one-dimensional (1D) confinement effect. Polymer crystallization of thin films on solid substrates, including commercial engineering plastics, such as PET and PA 6, has demonstrated that the chain orientation, segmental mobility, transporting process, and surface free energy at the interface can be influenced greatly by the 1D confinement. The lamellae with preferential orientations, either flat-on or edge-on, grown in polymer thin films indicate that the crystallization pathway or kinetics are different from that in bulk crystallization. ,,, It is also reported that some preordered structure, which is hardly detected or even absent in the bulk state, can be trapped in the 1D confined space. , For PBT thin films, we hypothesize that the 1D confinement effect may retain the mesophase once it has developed and/or slow down the transition from the metastable state to the crystal phase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this end, we investigate the thin-film crystallization of PBT from the amorphous state. Usually, polymer thin films with a thickness of less than ∼1 μm can impose a significantly one-dimensional (1D) confinement effect. Polymer crystallization of thin films on solid substrates, including commercial engineering plastics, such as PET and PA 6, has demonstrated that the chain orientation, segmental mobility, transporting process, and surface free energy at the interface can be influenced greatly by the 1D confinement. The lamellae with preferential orientations, either flat-on or edge-on, grown in polymer thin films indicate that the crystallization pathway or kinetics are different from that in bulk crystallization. ,,, It is also reported that some preordered structure, which is hardly detected or even absent in the bulk state, can be trapped in the 1D confined space. , For PBT thin films, we hypothesize that the 1D confinement effect may retain the mesophase once it has developed and/or slow down the transition from the metastable state to the crystal phase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%