2004
DOI: 10.2151/jmsj.82.179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dual-Doppler Radar Observations on Factors Causing Differences in the Structure of Snow Clouds during Winter Monsoon Surges

Abstract: Various processes of development in a convective cell were investigated in order to clarify the factors causing differences in the structure of snow clouds. Convective cells in snow clouds were observed by two Doppler radars over Ishikari Bay, Hokkaido, Japan, during winter monsoon surges. Seven cells that allowed us to examine structural changes were selected for the investigation. From the time series of maximum reflectivity and vertical mass flux in each cell, the analyzed cells were classified into two gro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Like other boxes, the NCAPE drops precipitously in the winter months (Figure b), and there is a slight shift to higher vertical velocities (Figure c); however, the shift in RPF size in the winter months is to smaller RPF sizes, unlike the oceanic seasonal progressions shown above. This region experiences most of its lightning during the winter months when there is advection of cold, dry Siberian air masses over the relatively warm water, providing enough instability to create strong convection at low levels, and thereby, increase the probability of lightning [ Kitagawa and Michimoto , ; Yamada et al , ] despite the absence of external forcing (cyclones, fronts, or orographic) [ Magono et al , ]. When we compare the 700 and 850 mbar temperatures for the Northwest Pacific and the Northwest Atlantic (Figure ), both at the same latitude interval, both east of a landmass, both in Northern Hemisphere winter, the temperatures at the same altitude are significantly different.…”
Section: Global Regional and Seasonal Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like other boxes, the NCAPE drops precipitously in the winter months (Figure b), and there is a slight shift to higher vertical velocities (Figure c); however, the shift in RPF size in the winter months is to smaller RPF sizes, unlike the oceanic seasonal progressions shown above. This region experiences most of its lightning during the winter months when there is advection of cold, dry Siberian air masses over the relatively warm water, providing enough instability to create strong convection at low levels, and thereby, increase the probability of lightning [ Kitagawa and Michimoto , ; Yamada et al , ] despite the absence of external forcing (cyclones, fronts, or orographic) [ Magono et al , ]. When we compare the 700 and 850 mbar temperatures for the Northwest Pacific and the Northwest Atlantic (Figure ), both at the same latitude interval, both east of a landmass, both in Northern Hemisphere winter, the temperatures at the same altitude are significantly different.…”
Section: Global Regional and Seasonal Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there is a large body of research on snow clouds over the Sea of Japan based on observations (Sakakibara et al 1988b;Ishihara et al 1989;Tsuboki et al 1989;Satoh et al 1992;Yamada et al 1994;Yamada et al 1996;Fujiyoshi et al 1998;Yoshimoto et al 2000;Yamada et al 2004;Yoshihara et al 2004;Kawashima and Fujiyoshi 2005), theories (Asai 1970), and numerical model simulations (Ikawa et al 1991;Murakami et al 1994a;Saito et al 1996), most do not treat the kinematic structures of L-mode snow bands under large band-transverse vertical shear. Even for wind-parallel bands occurring during ''lakee¤ect snow storms'' over Lake Michigan, numerous observational studies (e.g., Kelly 1982;Kristovich 1993;Kristovich et al 2003) and model simulations (e.g., Hsu 1987;Hjelmfeld 1990;Ballentine et al 1998) have not discussed band circulations in association with vertical shear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sometimes the need of avoiding wrong classification is more important than the classification accuracy, what can be achieved by this system. For example, when we consider to estimate the relationship between radar reflectivity and snowfall rate, we may permit lower particle classification ratio, but the misclassification is inadmissible [16].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the brightness classification ratio in one-dimensional classification was low -75. 16, what in consequence diminish the roughness -84.48% -performance slightly in the case of J pair. Table 3 presents the classification ratio achieved for DT classifier.…”
Section: Simple Classification Systemmentioning
confidence: 87%