2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2021.113883
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dual-detection fluorescent immunochromatographic assay for quantitative detection of SARS-CoV-2 spike RBD-ACE2 blocking neutralizing antibody

Abstract: The global effort against the COVID-19 pandemic dictates that routine quantitative detection of SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies is vital for assessing immunity following periodic revaccination against new viral variants. Here, we report a dual-detection fluorescent immunochromatographic assay (DFIA), with a built-in self-calibration process, that enables rapid quantitative detection of neutralizing antibodies that block binding between the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(32 reference statements)
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The anti-SARS-CoV-2 NAb level in the body is becoming an indispensable reference to evaluate the acquired protective immunity for SARS-CoV-2 [ 28 ]. Among all the NAb detection methods, LFIA has unique advantages, such as low cost, easy operation, and no need for complex pretreatment and sophisticated instruments [ 9 ]. The marker for signal output is the key component that concerns the performance of LFIA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The anti-SARS-CoV-2 NAb level in the body is becoming an indispensable reference to evaluate the acquired protective immunity for SARS-CoV-2 [ 28 ]. Among all the NAb detection methods, LFIA has unique advantages, such as low cost, easy operation, and no need for complex pretreatment and sophisticated instruments [ 9 ]. The marker for signal output is the key component that concerns the performance of LFIA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high-standard conditions cost much and require professional operator, which is unpractical for massive detection of NAbs. Therefore, several convenient methods, such as lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) [ 9 ], enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ 10 ], surface plasmon resonance assay [ 11 ], and some emerging digital microfluidic systems [ [12] , [13] , [14] ], have been developed to detect SARS-CoV-2 NAbs recently. Among all of them, the LFIA method enjoys portability, rapidity, simplicity, and low cost, and it has been widely used in the point-of-care immunosensors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a pseudovirus microneutralization of 1:40 as reference, they found that an inhibition in the RBD-ACE2 test higher than 50% yielded a very good prediction [18] . More recently, Duan et al developed a dual-detection fluorescent immunochromatographic assay (DFIA), with a built-in self-calibration process, that enables rapid quantitative detection of NAbs, and observed a good agreement with a commercial ELISA kit [19] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current clinical diagnostic methods for COVID-19 mainly include molecular (ribonucleic acid (RNA)), antigen, antibody, or imaging tests [ 2 , 11 ]. The reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for the detection of the RNA of SARS-CoV-2 is regarded as the gold standard in epidemic prevention and control because of its high sensitivity and specificity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%