2015
DOI: 10.1186/s12978-016-0123-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dual contraceptive method use and pregnancy intention among people living with HIV receiving HIV care at six hospitals in Thailand

Abstract: BackgroundDescribe dual contraceptive method use and the intention to become pregnant of people living with HIV (PLHIV) and their partners in Thailand.MethodsFrom January 2008–March 2009, we systematically selected a cohort of PLHIV from PLHIV seeking care at five tertiary care hospitals and one community hospital to complete a questionnaire assessing sexual activity, intention to become pregnant, and contraceptive practices at baseline and 12 months after enrollment. Participants received short family plannin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, because condoms are less effective at preventing pregnancy than more effective contraceptive methods, they should not be relied on for both pregnancy and STIs prevention or ‘dual protection.’ Instead, dual contraceptive method use is recommended if individuals are at high risk for STIs as well as pregnancy, using both barrier methods and more effective contraceptive methods [12]. In practice, dual contraceptive method use is challenging, with reports as low as 25% usage among women living with HIV [13], for likely the same reasons why condom use is a poor method for pregnancy prevention.…”
Section: General Principles For Contraceptive Provisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, because condoms are less effective at preventing pregnancy than more effective contraceptive methods, they should not be relied on for both pregnancy and STIs prevention or ‘dual protection.’ Instead, dual contraceptive method use is recommended if individuals are at high risk for STIs as well as pregnancy, using both barrier methods and more effective contraceptive methods [12]. In practice, dual contraceptive method use is challenging, with reports as low as 25% usage among women living with HIV [13], for likely the same reasons why condom use is a poor method for pregnancy prevention.…”
Section: General Principles For Contraceptive Provisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the recommendation, low rates of dual method use among people living with HIV have been reported in Brazil, Nigeria, and Thailand. 7 – 9 In SSA, limited data exist on dual method use in the general population, as well as among HIV-infected men and women in serodiscordant relationships, a population at high risk of HIV transmission. Therefore, in this analysis, we used data from a cross-sectional study in Malawi to estimate the prevalence of dual method use among HIV-infected men and women and assess the association between couple serodiscordance and dual method use.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This research resulted that the HIV status of spouses is statistically significant with the utilization of family planning methods. This has been emphasized by a national guideline of Ethiopia (31). Only 11 % of either the respondents or their partner had used the emergency contraceptive pill whereas, in Thailand as per the cohort study 29.6% had used the dual protection (30).…”
Section: Utilization Of the Family Planning Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%