2020
DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdaa024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dual BRAF/MEK blockade restores CNS responses in BRAF-mutant Erdheim–Chester disease patients following BRAF inhibitor monotherapy

Abstract: Background Erdheim–Chester disease (ECD), a rare inflammatory myeloid neoplasm, is known to be fundamentally reliant on the constitutive activation of the MAPK signaling pathway in the majority of patients. Consequently, inhibition of the V600E-mutant BRAF kinase has proven to be a safe and efficacious long-term therapeutic strategy for BRAF-mutant ECD patients. Nevertheless, in a subset of patients with CNS disease, the efficacy of long-term treatment may diminish, facilitating suboptimal re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are limited reports of unfavorable CNS responses to BRAF inhibitor monotherapy in BRAF V600E -mutated ECD that are salvaged with combined BRAF/MEK inhibitor therapy. 96 Our collective clinical experience reflects a related phenomenon of differential systemic vs neurologic responses to targeted therapies, with neurologic sites of disease responding to a lesser degree than systemic sites. In some cases, suboptimal response can be augmented by higher dosing or combined treatment, but a price is paid with toxicity and tolerability.…”
Section: Challenges and Future Directions For Neurohistiocytosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are limited reports of unfavorable CNS responses to BRAF inhibitor monotherapy in BRAF V600E -mutated ECD that are salvaged with combined BRAF/MEK inhibitor therapy. 96 Our collective clinical experience reflects a related phenomenon of differential systemic vs neurologic responses to targeted therapies, with neurologic sites of disease responding to a lesser degree than systemic sites. In some cases, suboptimal response can be augmented by higher dosing or combined treatment, but a price is paid with toxicity and tolerability.…”
Section: Challenges and Future Directions For Neurohistiocytosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recurrent activating kinase mutations and fusions involving the ERK cascade and PI3K/AKT pathways and specifically, mutations in BRAF V600E and its downstream gene, MAP2K1 [ 2 , 3 ] have been discovered in a large proportion of ECD patients [ 1 ]. Treatments that block the pro-inflammatory pathway of IL-1 or the RAS/RAF/ MEK/ERK tumorigenic mutational network have shown efficacy in refractory ECD [ 4 6 ]; however, some of these treatments (e.g., the BRAF inhibitors, vemurafenib, and dabrafenib) demonstrated only partial efficacy and caused severe adverse effects [ 7 , 8 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are non-LCH patients who do not benefit from targeted therapies, particularly those with histiocytic infiltration of the nervous system, which is associated with mortality in one non-LCH disorder. BRAF and MEK inhibitors have limited penetration into the nervous system, and worsening neurologic disease despite targeted therapy has been observed 2 . Additionally, these treatments can be limited or contraindicated by disease-related organ dysfunction or comorbidities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BRAF and MEK inhibitors have limited penetration into the nervous system and worsening neurologic disease despite targeted therapy has been observed. 2 These treatments can be limited or contraindicated by disease-related organ dysfunction or comorbidities. The subset of patients without MAPK alterations may not benefit from targeted therapies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%