2008
DOI: 10.3892/or.19.5.1305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dual anti-cancer effects of weekly intraperitoneal docetaxel in treatment of advanced gastric cancer patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis: A feasibility and pharmacokinetic study

Abstract: This study evaluated the feasibility and pharmacology of intraperitoneal docetaxel (IP docetaxel) when administered weekly for 3 consecutive weeks, followed by 1 week without treatment. A total of 24 patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of gastric cancer (10 preoperative, 7 postoperative and 7 recurrent) were enrolled in this study. Docetaxel was dissolved in an isotonic saline to a final 1 liter solution and was administered in a 1 h dosage of 25, 35, 45 and 60 mg/m 2 to determine the maximum tolerated dos… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
48
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, docetaxel has a pharmacokinetic advantage of two logs associated with its intraperitoneal delivery, and the systemic AUC after intraperitoneal administration is 2 times greater than that after standard intravenous administration [44,45]. These data indicate that docetaxel occupies a position between cisplatin and paclitaxel from the pharmacokinetic viewpoint (Figure 1).…”
Section: Pharmacokinetics and Local Toxicitymentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, docetaxel has a pharmacokinetic advantage of two logs associated with its intraperitoneal delivery, and the systemic AUC after intraperitoneal administration is 2 times greater than that after standard intravenous administration [44,45]. These data indicate that docetaxel occupies a position between cisplatin and paclitaxel from the pharmacokinetic viewpoint (Figure 1).…”
Section: Pharmacokinetics and Local Toxicitymentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Peritoneal metastasis is considered to be a non-measurable lesion because it is difficult to detect peritoneal metastasis by conventional radiological examinations. New response criteria for treatment against peritoneal metastasis were developed according to the findings of intraperitoneal photographs which were taken in the first and second laparoscopy [45]. In the phase II study to evaluate efficacy of S-1 plus IP docetaxel [74], the second staging laparoscopy after 2 cycles of combined chemotherapy showed response rate of 52% according to the response criteria for the treat-ment of peritoneal metastasis.…”
Section: Neoadjuvant Chemotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The area under the curve ratios of the intra-abdominal space to the plasma after IP administration of the drug are about 1000 for PTX, 207-552 for DOC, 10-24 for MMC, and 12-21 for CDDP [23][24][25][26][27][28] . The prolonged retention of IP administered taxanes within the IP space allows the taxanes to directly penetrate into peritoneal disseminated tumors [23,[29][30][31] , which leads to the destruction of peripheral microvessels of tumor nodules [32] .…”
Section: Rationale For Using Ip Chemotherapy With Taxanesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peritoneal dissemination is a critical indicator of poor prognosis and represents the most frequent metastatic pattern in gastric cancer [2]. Although clinical outcomes for patients with gastric cancer with peritoneal dissemination have improved with advances in systemic or intraperitoneal chemotherapy, or both, acceptable outcomes have not been achieved [3][4][5][6]. Peritoneal dissemination is characterized by the infiltration of cancer cells, and their proliferation is accompanied by extensive stromal fibrosis [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%