Du tiers-monde au monde multipolaire : l’évolution du paradigme du non-alignement dans la reconfiguration de l’ordre mondial

Ganapathy-Doré, Geetha

doi:10.3917/rfhip1.042.0117

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The Third World allowed revolutionaries to connect not only thanks to common theories of liberation (Marxism, anti-capitalism, the New Left) but also by considering this new space as an emancipated and emancipatory space where their encounter could generate new forms of protest. In this perspective, Africa was not a testing zone for the connectivity of foreign movements but a place where they could elaborate a political, intellectual Third World thought, away from its Eurocentric definitions (see Ganapathy-Doré, 2015) and unambiguously anticolonial.…”

Section: The Third World and Revolutionary Cosmopolitanism 1950s-1970smentioning

confidence: 99%

Introduction

Fila-Bakabadio

Palieraki

2018

African Identities

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A panoptic conceptWithin the last 10 years, cosmopolitanism has become, among other concepts, a popular notion in a broad spectrum of disciplines such as philosophy, law, political sciences, sociology, anthropology, and history. Many authors have tried to grasp its contours in an expanding literature in which it ranges from an ethics of encounter (Appiah, 2006), to the celebration of a common humanity, to a Western-based universalism (Gilroy, 2004) or some 'translocal' citizenship (Appadurai, 1996). However, defining its meaning still is difficult. In the midst of this now large and somehow overwhelming literature, the political scientist James D. Ingram provides some valuable insight to answer the question: 'why is it so difficult to define cosmopolitanism?':Cosmopolitanism has an ancient pedigree and today, in the wake of its recent resurgence, it is used to refer to a great variety of things. This terminological imprecision [...] is compounded by the fact that, at least if it is taken literally, the term is impossible, hyperbolic or paradoxical. We cannot in any literal or legal sense be 'citizens of the world, ' let alone of the 'cosmos, ' since neither is a political unit. Any use of the concept is necessarily figurative. (Ingram, 2016, p. 68) Beyond the hyperbolic character of this notion, Ingram's comment confirms that cosmopolitanism imposes a challenge to social sciences: it usually refers to some global citizenship and therefore deals with power and power relationships. This is how the first studies on cosmopolitanism that developed in the late 1990s and the early 2000s, envisioned it. As the Cold War ended and while global studies emerged in the academy, political scientists and philosophers engaged in a discussion about new models of global governance and the

show abstract

Section: The Third World and Revolutionary Cosmopolitanism 1950s-1970smentioning

confidence: 99%

Introduction

Fila-Bakabadio

Palieraki

2018

African Identities

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Le « soldat augmenté » : révolution technologique et militaire

Bourgois

2024

Questions Internationales

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Au cours des deux dernières décennies, plusieurs puissances militaires se sont lancées dans la course au « super soldat », et ce dans ses multiples dimensions. À cet égard, quelles sont les évolutions (voire transformations) entourant le « soldat augmenté » ? Après avoir présenté la réalité du phénomène et mis en lumière la nature des évolutions technoscientifiques qui pourraient modifier les combattants, il convient d’évoquer les conséquences et enjeux entourant l’« augmentation » militaire .

show abstract

Du tiers-monde au monde multipolaire : l’évolution du paradigme du non-alignement dans la reconfiguration de l’ordre mondial

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

Introduction

Introduction

Le « soldat augmenté » : révolution technologique et militaire

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About