2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.09.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DTI-based connectome analysis of adolescents with major depressive disorder reveals hypoconnectivity of the right caudate

Abstract: Background Adolescence is a vulnerable period for the onset of major depressive disorder (MDD). While some studies have shown white matter alterations in adolescent MDD, there is still a gap in understanding how the brain is affected at a network level. Methods We compared diffusion tensor imaging (DTI)-based brain networks in a cohort of 57 adolescents with MDD and 41 well-matched healthy controls who completed self-reports of depression symptoms and stressful life events. Using atlas-based brain regions as… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
54
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
5
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Depressed adolescents show disrupted balance of cortico-striatal circuit function, with low striatal response and high medial prefrontal response to reward (45). A recent diffusion MRI-based study also revealed a right caudate-centered sub-network of lower structural connectivity in adolescents with MDD (46). Both acute and chronic stress also appears to increase reward deficits, which, in turn, raises the risk for depression (47).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Depressed adolescents show disrupted balance of cortico-striatal circuit function, with low striatal response and high medial prefrontal response to reward (45). A recent diffusion MRI-based study also revealed a right caudate-centered sub-network of lower structural connectivity in adolescents with MDD (46). Both acute and chronic stress also appears to increase reward deficits, which, in turn, raises the risk for depression (47).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…This is a non-parametric method used to identify significant differences between groups of networks, while controlling for multiple comparisons that arise from comparing 9 a large number of connections. This method has been used to assess alterations of brain connectivity in a number of neurological and psychiatric disorders, including schizophrenia (Zalesky et al, 2011;Zhang et al, 2015), ADHD (Cocchi et al, 2012;Cao et al, 2013;Silk et al, 2016;Beare et al, 2017), depression (Zhang et al, 2011;Korgaonkar et al, 2014;Long et al, 2015;Sacchet et al, 2016;Tymofiyeva et al, 2017) and epilepsy (Besson et al, 2014). The NBS method controls the family-wise error rate by making the assumption that relevant differences in connectivity between groups are confined to connections that are connected with each other and thus form sub-networks in the larger network.…”
Section: Group Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, DTI studies revealed caudate-centric models of dysfunctional processes underlying adolescent depression (Tymofiyeva et al, 2016). It is possible that differential connectivity patterns may be observed across the caudate and temporal cortex in MDD.…”
Section: Limitations Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%