2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.comcom.2020.02.068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DST-HRS: A topic driven hybrid recommender system based on deep semantics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, it is great to devote future research to developing and extracting more other features from the similarity graph, which we did not mention in the current study. Besides, the structure of the Autoencoder might be an impor- (Bag et al, 2019) -1.7 DST-HRS (Khan et al, 2020) -0.846 Autoencoder COFILS (Barbieri et al, 2017) 0.885 0.838 Baseline COFILS (Barbieri et al, 2017) 0.892 0.848 Kernel PCA COFILS (Barbieri et al, 2017) 0.898 -Slope One (Lemire and Maclachlan, 2005) 0.937 0.9 Regularized SVD (Paterek, 2007) 0.989 0.96 Improved Regularized SVD (Paterek, 2007) 0.954 0.907 SVD++ (Koren, 2008) 0.903 0.856 Non-Negative Matrix Factorization (Lee and Seung, 2001) 0.944 0.912 Bayesian Probabilistic Matrix Factorization (Salakhutdinov and Mnih, 2008) 0.901 0.84 RBM-CF (Salakhutdinov et al, 2007) 0.936 0.872 AutoRec (Sedhain et al, 2015) 0.887 0.844 Mean Field (Langseth and Nielsen, 2015) 0.903 0.856 GHRS (Proposed Method) 0.887 0.833 tant area for future research. The different structures should be examined regarding the Autoencoder structure affecting feature extraction, training duration, and the model's final performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, it is great to devote future research to developing and extracting more other features from the similarity graph, which we did not mention in the current study. Besides, the structure of the Autoencoder might be an impor- (Bag et al, 2019) -1.7 DST-HRS (Khan et al, 2020) -0.846 Autoencoder COFILS (Barbieri et al, 2017) 0.885 0.838 Baseline COFILS (Barbieri et al, 2017) 0.892 0.848 Kernel PCA COFILS (Barbieri et al, 2017) 0.898 -Slope One (Lemire and Maclachlan, 2005) 0.937 0.9 Regularized SVD (Paterek, 2007) 0.989 0.96 Improved Regularized SVD (Paterek, 2007) 0.954 0.907 SVD++ (Koren, 2008) 0.903 0.856 Non-Negative Matrix Factorization (Lee and Seung, 2001) 0.944 0.912 Bayesian Probabilistic Matrix Factorization (Salakhutdinov and Mnih, 2008) 0.901 0.84 RBM-CF (Salakhutdinov et al, 2007) 0.936 0.872 AutoRec (Sedhain et al, 2015) 0.887 0.844 Mean Field (Langseth and Nielsen, 2015) 0.903 0.856 GHRS (Proposed Method) 0.887 0.833 tant area for future research. The different structures should be examined regarding the Autoencoder structure affecting feature extraction, training duration, and the model's final performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deep graph neural network (Yin et al , 2019), deep learning-based recommender system (Aujla et al , 2019), social attentive deep learning (Lei et al , 2020) and patient diet recommender system (Iwendi et al , 2020) were the key contributions in the field of RS. LSTM-based approaches (Zarzour et al , 2020), music recommender using deep learning (Fessahaye et al , 2019), autoencoder for top-N recommendations (Pan et al , 2019; Jiang et al , 2020; https://nijianmo.github.i; Zhu et al , 2017), reinforcement learning (Yuan et al , 2020), medical image segmentation using deep learning (Wang et al , 2020), topic-driven hybrid approach (Khan et al , 2020) and a deep learning approach with K pickup points (Berdeddouch et al , 2020) are important approaches found. Collaborative deep learning (Yang et al , 2020) and joint representation learning (Wu et al , 2017) are other approaches studied.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, sentiment analysis has been proposed to predict song contest results [ 16 ]. For recommender systems, LDA-based topic hybrid recommender system has been proposed [ 33 ], and semantic analysis for recommendations has been also used in learning environments [ 32 ]. Moreover, semantic modeling of the user interactions with a chatbot allows for personalized interactions [ 43 ].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%