2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drying of kaffir lime leaves in a fluidized bed dryer with inert particles: Kinetics and quality determination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The moisture ratio decreased with time at all drying temperatures. Similar trend was observed during drying of other food materials in fluidized bed [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]48] and other types of dryers [28,[49][50][51][52][53][54][55]. At any instant of time, moisture ratio was lower at higher drying temperature.…”
Section: Drying Curvessupporting
confidence: 70%
“…The moisture ratio decreased with time at all drying temperatures. Similar trend was observed during drying of other food materials in fluidized bed [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]48] and other types of dryers [28,[49][50][51][52][53][54][55]. At any instant of time, moisture ratio was lower at higher drying temperature.…”
Section: Drying Curvessupporting
confidence: 70%
“…This phenomenon can be attributed to the increase of the vapor's pressure inside the samples, which would lead to the rapid movement of water at elevated drying temperatures (Shi et al, 2013). The values of the effective moisture diffusion coefficients obtained from the experiments was similar to the results by some researchers, from 7.20×10 −9 to 1.91×10 −8 m 2 /s for the thin-layer drying of sweet sorghum stalks at 30-70°C (Shen et al, 2011), 4.08×10 −8 to 2.35×10 −7 m 2 /s for convective drying of pumpkin (Cucurbita maxima) at 30-70 o C. However, these values of D eff are higher than the general range of 10 −9 to 10 −11 m 2 /s as reported for agriculture and industrial products by other researchers, for instance 5.42×10 −11 to 9.29×10 −10 for pistachio nuts (Kashaninejad et al, 2007), 8.21×10 −10 to 2.61×10 −9 for castor oil seeds (Perea-Flores et al, 2012), 2.61×10 −11 to 9.24×10 −11 for kaffir lime leaves (Tasirin, Puspasari, Lun, Chai, & Lee, 2014). The difference of the D eff for different biological materials might be due to the different drying temperatures employed, physical or chemical pretreatment, moisture content and sample variety, composition and geometry of drying materials.…”
Section: Effective Moisture Diffusivity (D Eff )mentioning
confidence: 54%
“…The surface moisture on biomass materials increases the inter-particle forces dramatically [5], at several times bigger than the particle weight, which could lead to channeling, gas bypassing and eventually defluidization. Previous researchers introduced inert particles such as sand to the system to assist fluidization of biomass particles [6][7][8][9]. However, it increases ash content in biomass product due to attrition of inert materials, degrading the quality of biomass pellets and subsequently posing serious problems to biomass-powered boilers and turbines that may as a result encounter corrosion, sintering, and slagging, which will require additional maintenance for the removal of deposits and even unscheduled shutdowns [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%