2006
DOI: 10.1080/07373930500538725
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drying of Guava and Papaya: Impact of Different Drying Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
43
1
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
6
43
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…From the results of this study, modified air heat pump drying seems to offer a great potential, but related research is scarce. Hawlader et al (2006c) investigated the effect of nitrogen and carbon dioxide on heat pump drying of guava and papaya. Both drying kinetics and quality of these dried fruits resulting from these two methods were compared with normal air HPD, vacuum dryer, and freeze dryer.…”
Section: Heat Pump Dryingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the results of this study, modified air heat pump drying seems to offer a great potential, but related research is scarce. Hawlader et al (2006c) investigated the effect of nitrogen and carbon dioxide on heat pump drying of guava and papaya. Both drying kinetics and quality of these dried fruits resulting from these two methods were compared with normal air HPD, vacuum dryer, and freeze dryer.…”
Section: Heat Pump Dryingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), and 90°C (17.1 ± 2.3 mg AA/100 g d.m.). The loss of vitamin C, which is a thermo-sensitive compound, was likely due to the elevated processing temperature (Sigge et al, 2001;Hawlader et al, 2006) and period of exposure; e.g., 810 min were required to dry the sample at 50°C. Vitamin C is also hydrosoluble; thus, it may have been solubilized during rehydration (Vinson et al, 2005).…”
Section: Physicochemical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, though the FD-EPD dried chips also obtained a fine porous structure, it did not exhibit the same high rehydration rate compared with the FD dried product. It was hypothesized that, in the case of the FD-EPD dried products, the puffing structure might not be able to absorb water quickly due to the size of the porous structure was too large to facilitate a fast capillary effect (Hawlader et al 2006). which might be an explanation for their relatively low rehydration rate compared with the FD dried chips.…”
Section: Rehydrationmentioning
confidence: 99%