2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2006.04.056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drying of cherry tomato by a combination of different dehydration techniques. Comparison of kinetics and other related properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
39
1
10

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
39
1
10
Order By: Relevance
“…These changes in pectic substances result in weakening of the cell walls and reduction of the cohesive forces that bind cells together (Trinchero et al 1999). Similar behaviour during drying was also reported by other researchers working with cherry tomato (Heredia et al 2007), pepino fruit (Di ) and blueberries (López et al 2009). The fracturability and adhesivenesss (work necessary to pull the compression anvil away from the sample) of dehydrated samples did not present significant differences compared to that of fresh samples (p<0.05).…”
Section: Texture Profile Analysissupporting
confidence: 74%
“…These changes in pectic substances result in weakening of the cell walls and reduction of the cohesive forces that bind cells together (Trinchero et al 1999). Similar behaviour during drying was also reported by other researchers working with cherry tomato (Heredia et al 2007), pepino fruit (Di ) and blueberries (López et al 2009). The fracturability and adhesivenesss (work necessary to pull the compression anvil away from the sample) of dehydrated samples did not present significant differences compared to that of fresh samples (p<0.05).…”
Section: Texture Profile Analysissupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The texturometer was mounted with a 500 N load cell and equipped with a 2 mm flat head stainless steel cylindrical probe which punctures the sample at a download speed of 200 mm/min and a distance of 10 mm (18). A single whole tomato was placed on the stage for each measurement.…”
Section: Firmnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observed changes are due to hardening, movement of soluble solids and retraction (KROKIDA;PHILIPPOPOULOS, 2005). High temperatures or long drying times can cause serious damage to product flavor, color and nutrients, and reduce the rehydration capacity of the dried product (DOYMAZ, 2007;BARRERA;ANDRÉS, 2007;MURATORE et al, 2008;CRUZ;BRAGA;GRANDI, 2012). The damages are most common pigment degradation, especially carotenoids like lycopene (responsible for the red color in tomatoes) and chlorophyll, and browning reactions such as Maillard condensation of hexoses and amino components, and oxidation of ascorbic acid.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other factors affecting color include fruit pH, acidity, processing temperature and duration, fruit cultivar and heavy metal contamination (MARFIL;SANTOS;TELIS, 2008;MURATORE et al, 2008). Consumer demand has increased for processed products that keep more of their sensory properties and their nutritional value, so that it has become necessary to optimize drying conditions in order to achieve certain characteristics related to colour, texture and water content (HEREDIA; BARREA; ANDRÉS, 2007;CRUZ;BRAGA;GRANDI, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%