2014
DOI: 10.5897/ajar2013.7759
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drying kinetics and quality characteristics of beetroot slices under hot air followed by microwave finish drying

Abstract: The experiments were conducted to evaluate the impact of air temperature and microwave power level on drying behavior and quality of beetroot. The osmotically pretreated samples in sugar-salt mixed solution were further dehydrated using convective tray drier upto a moisture content of 40 to 60% db (the point where drying rate became slow) followed by microwave drying to a moisture content of 6% (bone dry conditions) to overcome the slow removal of moisture content in the end. Three levels of air temperature 55… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Water removal is based on the natural and nondestructive phenomenon of osmosis across cell membranes (Kar & Gupta, 2001;Kaur and Singh, 2014 ). The higher osmotic pressure of the hypertonic solution acts as the driving force for the diffusion of water from the tissue into the solution with concomitant counter diffusion of solutes from the osmotic solution into the tissue.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Water removal is based on the natural and nondestructive phenomenon of osmosis across cell membranes (Kar & Gupta, 2001;Kaur and Singh, 2014 ). The higher osmotic pressure of the hypertonic solution acts as the driving force for the diffusion of water from the tissue into the solution with concomitant counter diffusion of solutes from the osmotic solution into the tissue.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Henderson & Pabis model has also been used successfully to describe the drying kinetics of ginger (Thorat et al, 2012), strawberry (Doymaz, 2008), beetroot (Figiel, 2010), and oregano (Figiel et al, 2010). On the other hand, the logarithmic model was found to be suitable for peach slices (Kingsly et al, 2007) and beetroot slices (Kaur & Singh, 2014), while for the description of drying behavior of garlic using vacuum, the modified Page model was proposed (Calin‐Sanchez et al, 2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparable observations have been reported for apples and carrots by Funebo and Ohlsson (1998), who found that the finishing method gave better rehydration results. However, Drouzas and Schubert (1996) observed that banana slices dried in vacuum absorbed twice as much moisture as the product of the conventional method, while Kaur and Singh (2014) reported that the microwave finish method helped in reducing shrinkage and avoiding surface hardening of beets.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5, which shows the differences between the each drying methods. Based on the drying curve of the different beetroot and according to other scientific results [21][22][23] the microwave drying resulted faster drying compared to the traditional method and it is effective on lower temperature except the MV40 method, where the pre-drying was longer because of the low temperature.…”
Section: Drying Datamentioning
confidence: 93%