2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.06.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drying kinetics, adsorption isotherms and quality characteristics of vacuum-dried beef slices with different salt contents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
5
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The k values for the USV method were 0.111, 0.322, and 0.489 at 55, 65, and 75 • C, respectively (k units not specified). The n values obtained with the Page model ranged between 0.868 and 1.10 for all temperatures and techniques and are similar to the n values determined in other studies on beef drying kinetics (Aykın-Dinçer & Erbaş, 2018;Aykın-Dinçer et al, 2020;Mewa et al, 2018). Higher D eff values were found at higher temperatures with the highest values for the USV technique, followed by the VD and the OD techniques.…”
Section: Vd and Usvsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The k values for the USV method were 0.111, 0.322, and 0.489 at 55, 65, and 75 • C, respectively (k units not specified). The n values obtained with the Page model ranged between 0.868 and 1.10 for all temperatures and techniques and are similar to the n values determined in other studies on beef drying kinetics (Aykın-Dinçer & Erbaş, 2018;Aykın-Dinçer et al, 2020;Mewa et al, 2018). Higher D eff values were found at higher temperatures with the highest values for the USV technique, followed by the VD and the OD techniques.…”
Section: Vd and Usvsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Since we extrapolated results from Kabil et al (2012) to a temperature range of 35–55°C and used vinegar, we conducted a comparison to check the consistency of this approach. As shown in Figure 2, our lab measurements (using vinegar) are of the same order of magnitude as both experimental measurements and the Halsey equation taken from Kabil et al (2012) and measurements reported by other authors (Aykin‐Dinçer & Erbaş, 2018; Van der Riet, 1976). In addition, the observed slight effect of the temperature is acceptable even though impossible to truly validate because of the lack of corresponding data in the literature.…”
Section: Model Descriptionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Only a few studies have modeled the drying of small muscles or strips, mainly of fresh meat (Ahmat, Barka, Aregba, & Bruneau, 2015; Trujillo, Wiangkaew, & Pham, 2007) and salted meat (Chabbouh, Sahli, & Bellagha, 2013; Kucerova, Hubackova, Rohlik, & Banout, 2015). It is well known that the salt content of the meat affects the desorption isotherm and consequently drying kinetics (Comaposada, Gou, Pakowski, & Arnau, 2000), but only one recent study (Aykin‐Dinçer & Erbaş, 2018) showed that beef drying kinetics were closely linked with salt content. To our knowledge, very little literature is available on the modeling of drying of previously formulated small pieces of meat and none on beef that has undergone salting and acidification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a reason, it can be considered that dry salting is more effective than brine salting in terms of water dehydration (Guizani et al , 2008). In addition, studies have reported that as the salt ratio increases, the drying speed increases (Aykın-Dinçer and Erbaş, 2018).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%