1992
DOI: 10.1016/0043-1648(92)90189-f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dry rolling-sliding wear of bainitic and pearlitic steels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In many instances, the results have indicated that this microstructure does not in general outperform pearlite with similar hardness and loading conditions [3,[10][11][12][13], the exception being a 0.04 wt%C bainitic steel that had a lower wear rate (rolling-sliding) than less-ductile pearlite of similar strength [2]. The greater wear resistance of pearlite is attributed to the ability of the microstructure to deform during rolling and sliding [12], the work-hardening of the ferritic component [13,14] and the significant presence of hard cementite at the wear surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In many instances, the results have indicated that this microstructure does not in general outperform pearlite with similar hardness and loading conditions [3,[10][11][12][13], the exception being a 0.04 wt%C bainitic steel that had a lower wear rate (rolling-sliding) than less-ductile pearlite of similar strength [2]. The greater wear resistance of pearlite is attributed to the ability of the microstructure to deform during rolling and sliding [12], the work-hardening of the ferritic component [13,14] and the significant presence of hard cementite at the wear surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The wear behaviour of bainitic steels subjected to rolling and sliding conditions has been studied for a variety of circumstances [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. In many instances, the results have indicated that this microstructure does not in general outperform pearlite with similar hardness and loading conditions [3,[10][11][12][13], the exception being a 0.04 wt%C bainitic steel that had a lower wear rate (rolling-sliding) than less-ductile pearlite of similar strength [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been established in earlier work [13,15,17,19,20] that in standard grade, pearlitic rail steels subject to cyclic wheel-rail contact, where some pro-eutectoid (PE) ferrite was present at PA grain boundaries, there was strain-partitioning between the PE ferrite and the fully pearlitic zones. Earlier ductility exhaustion took place in the PE ferrite than in the fully pearlitic zones and hence RCF crack initiation and propagation took place along the PE ferrite / pearlite boundaries [20,21].…”
Section: Crack Characteristics For Cracks Up To Pa Grain Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have shown better rolling contact fatigue resistance than pearlitic rail steels. However, the wear resistance of bainitic rail steels is inferior to that of pearlitic rail steels at a fixed tensile strength, as shown by Garnham and Beynon [18] and Mitao et al [19].…”
Section: Wear Measurements and Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 96%