2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dry phantom for magnetoencephalography —Configuration, calibration, and contribution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this experiment, the smallest source localization error was 4.0 mm when I = 100 A and the averaging number is 400. This error was much larger than that obtained by the SQUID-based MEG systems 7) . A lower signal-to-noise ratio, smaller measuring points, and a lack of accuracy of sensor positioning are considered to be the causes of the larger source localization error.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this experiment, the smallest source localization error was 4.0 mm when I = 100 A and the averaging number is 400. This error was much larger than that obtained by the SQUID-based MEG systems 7) . A lower signal-to-noise ratio, smaller measuring points, and a lack of accuracy of sensor positioning are considered to be the causes of the larger source localization error.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Quantitative evaluation can be achieved using phantom experiments instead of examination of a human subject. The authors have developed a new phantom and an associated calibration method designed for quantitative evaluation of MEG systems 7) . This phantom was calibrated and its uncertainty was determined so as to ensure reproducibility and reliability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, any error in the ULF MRI calibration could then produce errors in the sensor-array geometry. To keep the calibration of the array geometry independent of the ULF MRI calibration, we assumed the sensor array was calibrated, e.g., with a geometrically accurate electrical phantom [13], [28], [29]. Nonetheless, it is not known if alternating iterations of spatial ULF MRI calibrations and sensor array calibrations using only ULF MRI data could be used to perform both calibrations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This head dry phantom contains 32 current dipoles. The phantom is based on the mathematical fact that an equilateral triangular line current produces equivalent magnetic field distribution to that of a tangential current dipole in a spherical conductor, provided that the vertex of the triangle and the origin of the conducting sphere coincide [43]. The phantom dipoles are energized using an internal signal generator to get a dipole moment of 12.7 nAm.…”
Section: A Simulated Meg Recordings With a Brain Phantommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recordings were first post-processed with SSS [43] after identifying bad channels and periods contaminated by artifacts. Epochs from 2.5 seconds before to 2.5 seconds after the beep sound were extracted.…”
Section: Squidsmentioning
confidence: 99%