2019
DOI: 10.6090/jarq.53.255
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dry Matter Yield Response to Seeding Rate and Row Spacing in Direct-seeded and Double-harvested Forage Rice

Abstract: Forage rice (Oryza sativa L.) must be cost competitive with other fodders, and thus an important goal is increasing its dry matter (DM) and total digestible nutrient (TDN) yields, while reducing labor and costs. Although the direct seeding of rice does not have higher yield stability than transplanting, it has the potential to reduce labor and costs. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of seeding rate (2, 4, or 6 g m -2 ) and row spacing (10 or 30 cm) on DM and TDN yields in direct-seeded … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, we identified growth‐related indicators that affected white‐back grain percentage and grain protein content. Growth‐related traits are influenced by the growing season, planting density, and cultivar (Nakano & Morita, 2009; Nakano & Tsuchiya, 2012; Nakano et al., 2008, 2012, 2014, 2019). Therefore, it is imperative to examine the relationships among grain appearance, protein content, and growing conditions to achieve an optimal methodology for N application.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we identified growth‐related indicators that affected white‐back grain percentage and grain protein content. Growth‐related traits are influenced by the growing season, planting density, and cultivar (Nakano & Morita, 2009; Nakano & Tsuchiya, 2012; Nakano et al., 2008, 2012, 2014, 2019). Therefore, it is imperative to examine the relationships among grain appearance, protein content, and growing conditions to achieve an optimal methodology for N application.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we discovered that TIL PI was determined predominantly by planting density and N til , which could be expressed as either seeding rate or ASD (Table 3). Previous studies also demonstrated the significant influence of seeding rate on rice tiller numbers under direct‐seeded conditions 26 . Although both models, using either seeding rate or ASD as input, performed similarly well in the early season, the model with ASD as input outperformed the model with seeding rate as input in the late season, as indicated by the F value and R 2 values for the equations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Previous studies also demonstrated the significant influence of seeding rate on rice tiller numbers under direct-seeded conditions. 26 Although both models, using either seeding rate or ASD as input, performed similarly well in the early season, the model with ASD as input outperformed the model with seeding rate as input in the late season, as indicated by the F value and R 2 values for the equations. Furthermore, when pooled data from the early and late seasons were analyzed, the R 2 of the model using seeding rate as input were 0.351 in 2017 and 0.741 in 2020, which was significantly lower than that with ASD as input in both years (0.856 in 2017 and 0.892 in 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In this study, we proposed a novel topdressing method after analysis of the relationships between grain yield and growth‐related factors. Both grain yield and biomass are influenced by growing season, planting density, and cultivars in southwestern Japan (Nakano & Morita, 2009; Nakano & Tsuchiya, 2012; Nakano, Morita, Hattori, & Sato, 2008, Nakano et al., 2012, Nakano, Hattori, & Morita, 2014, 2019). Thus, examining the relationships between grain yield and growth‐related traits of rice plants grown under various cultivation methods is very important for further adjustment of this method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%