2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0955-3959(03)00006-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drugs in the UN system: the unwritten history of the 1998 United Nations General Assembly Special Session on drugs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
21
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The dominant policy referential preserves state control over substances categorized as dangerous and over behaviours defined as deviant. Accordingly, the global drug policy arena is characterized by a high level of institutional, ideological and political constraint (Fazey ; Jelsma ; Trace ).…”
Section: ‘Going Global’: the Case Of The Global Commission On Drug Pomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dominant policy referential preserves state control over substances categorized as dangerous and over behaviours defined as deviant. Accordingly, the global drug policy arena is characterized by a high level of institutional, ideological and political constraint (Fazey ; Jelsma ; Trace ).…”
Section: ‘Going Global’: the Case Of The Global Commission On Drug Pomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…UNGASS represented a victory for a hard‐line, prohibitionist approach . Calls for re‐assessment, open‐minded and critical evaluation of current strategies and alternative approaches were silenced by the dominant rhetoric of commitment to the goal of a ‘drug‐free world’ (Jelsma ). In a similar vein McCoy has argued that in the drug war the US and the UN had become almost theologically committed to aggressive prohibition and supply reduction (: 25).…”
Section: War On Drugs In Laosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This initiative culminated in the Special Session on Drugs (United Nations General Assembly Special Session (UNGASS)) held in 1998 in New York, where logically Mexico should have been the presiding country. Yet its role was usurped by the USA, who took the lead and used the occasion to confirm the prohibitionist focus that Mexico had challenged to begin with (Jelsma, 2003) iii .…”
Section: Growing Discontentmentioning
confidence: 99%