2011
DOI: 10.1155/2011/259426
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drugs for Pain Management in Shock Wave Lithotripsy

Abstract: Objective. With this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the main aspects and currently used drugs for analgesia in shockwave lithotripsy. Evidence Acquisition. We reviewed current literature, concentrating on newer articles and high-quality reviews in international journals. Results. No standardized protocols for pain control in SWL exist, although it is crucial for treatment outcome. General and spinal anaesthesia show excellent pain control but are only recommended for selected cases. The newer o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
25
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(89 reference statements)
0
25
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This strategy may explain the difference between our results and that of Tailly et al (14) BMI and skin-to-stone distance was relevant as expected. Their effect on VAS score was not statistically significant in our study contrary to the study by Bach et al (15). The reason might be that there was no significant difference between the body weight of our patients.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 96%
“…This strategy may explain the difference between our results and that of Tailly et al (14) BMI and skin-to-stone distance was relevant as expected. Their effect on VAS score was not statistically significant in our study contrary to the study by Bach et al (15). The reason might be that there was no significant difference between the body weight of our patients.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 96%
“…More side effects would be anticipated from using opioids than simple analgesics or NSAIDs. [14,15]. Still, there is no consensus on the standard analgesic regimen for controlling pain during ESWL.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other acoustic pulse devices on the market are often known as Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (ESWT) devices similar to kidney stone lithotripsy devices. These often have reflectors that focus the pressure pulse into small areas about 2–3 mm in diameter at very high pressures, with risk for adjacent tissue damage and pain . Other similar devices, often considered Therapeutic Massagers, usually have slow pressure rise times, low peak pressures, and relatively low pulse rates of 10–20 per second.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison, the RAP device generates planar acoustic shock wave pulses across the entire 1.3 inch diameter treatment window allowing treatment of larger areas at once, using a fast pulse rate of 100 per second, resulting in shorter treatment times. Additionally, the RAP pulses are very short in duration (100–200 nanoseconds) with fast rise and fall times to relatively high peak pressures and minimal negative pressures (some other devices have large negative pressures during each pulse cycle that cause cavitation bubbles resulting in pain ). This combination allows fast and efficient dispersion of whitening vacuoles and ink particles without discomfort or adjacent tissue damage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%