2016
DOI: 10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20160771
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drug utilization pattern in acute coronary syndrome at tertiary care hospital: a prospective cross-sectional observational study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
4
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7,12,13 Although, this particular finding was contradictory to the findings cited by Yusuf et al, Rajanandha et al, Choudhary et al, Vamadevan et al, mentioning underuse of these 4 evidenced based drugs used for secondary prophylaxis in low income countries. 3,8,10,17 Anti-anginal drugs were prescribed to 70% of patients which was comparable to the reports presented by Dawalji et al, Sandozi et al, Thaker et al, in the similar studies. 13,15,18 The use of lipid lowering agent was found in 89% of patients which was again similar to the findings stated by Dawalji et al, Choudhary et al, Thaker et al, reflecting the rational use of these drugs for the purpose of secondary prophylaxis in CAD.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…7,12,13 Although, this particular finding was contradictory to the findings cited by Yusuf et al, Rajanandha et al, Choudhary et al, Vamadevan et al, mentioning underuse of these 4 evidenced based drugs used for secondary prophylaxis in low income countries. 3,8,10,17 Anti-anginal drugs were prescribed to 70% of patients which was comparable to the reports presented by Dawalji et al, Sandozi et al, Thaker et al, in the similar studies. 13,15,18 The use of lipid lowering agent was found in 89% of patients which was again similar to the findings stated by Dawalji et al, Choudhary et al, Thaker et al, reflecting the rational use of these drugs for the purpose of secondary prophylaxis in CAD.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…13,15,18 The use of lipid lowering agent was found in 89% of patients which was again similar to the findings stated by Dawalji et al, Choudhary et al, Thaker et al, reflecting the rational use of these drugs for the purpose of secondary prophylaxis in CAD. 13,17,18 In present study, authors also found 51% of patients were prescribed aspirin and clopidogrel along with a proton pump inhibitor. This finding perhaps is contradictory to the textual evidence stating the reduction in the therapeutic benefit of clopidogrel when administered with a proton pump inhibitor.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…8 This shows that acute coronary syndrome is more in this age group. In our study males (93) were more common than the females (32), which was comparable to other studies which say that cardiovascular emergencies were more common in males than the females.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…8,9 The association of physicians of India recommends that all patients with myocardial infarction should receive dual antiplatelet therapy. 8 It was told in another study that Aspirin along with Clopidogrel may offer benefits over either drug used alone in Ischemic heart disease associated with Hypertension and Diabetes mellitus. 4 In our study Atorvastatin was the preferred Hypolipidemic drug given to all patients (100%) as similar to another study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…98.3% drugs were prescribed by brand names and which was higher than results reported by Christian et al (19.5%, 80.5% -generic names and brand names respectively) and Choudhary et al (16.88% drugs prescribed by generic names and 83.12% drugs by brand names). 19,21 Low instances of prescription of drug by generic names should be addressed appropriately as prescribing drugs by brand names not only inflates the cost but also evokes an adverse drug response due to confusing drug nomenclature. 22 Use of drugs from the National List of Essential Medicines was 92.79% which was higher than the findings of Christian et al (75.7%) and Al Junid et al (28%).…”
Section: (2455%)mentioning
confidence: 99%