2002
DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1159
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drug testing, drug treatment, and marijuana use: A fairness perspective.

Abstract: The authors conducted a random statewide telephone survey of 1,484 individuals to study the relationship between marijuana use (in terms of participants' history of marijuana use) and reactions to drug testing and to study 2 hypothetical drug-treatment policies. Job safety sensitivity was related to perceived fairness of drug testing for the participant's job, and more recent marijuana use was associated with more negative reactions. Safety sensitivity was related to perceived fairness of drug treatment. Organ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(48 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several concerns were expressed that the policy, particularly regarding urine testing, was unfair for marijuana users. Such attitudes in the past have been explained using self-interest (Paronto et al, 2002). However, the comments indicated a sophisticated knowledge of the link between marijuana, drug testing and impairment, including beliefs that marijuana residue was more enduring than other drugs; leading to a greater chance of detection even without impairment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Several concerns were expressed that the policy, particularly regarding urine testing, was unfair for marijuana users. Such attitudes in the past have been explained using self-interest (Paronto et al, 2002). However, the comments indicated a sophisticated knowledge of the link between marijuana, drug testing and impairment, including beliefs that marijuana residue was more enduring than other drugs; leading to a greater chance of detection even without impairment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Assessing demographic associations with attitudes formation at best shows weak support for a self-interest explanation of attitudes (Paronto et al, 2002;Sujac et al, 1995;Truxillo et al, 2001;Zinkiewicz et al, 2000). Males and bluecollar workers, who typically have higher AOD use, did generally have lesspositive ratings across attitude dimensions, and rated the policy as less effective.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In fact, the majority of the research in this area has been based on sample results of various types of employees (see Brown, Bain, & Freeman, 2008;Paronto, Truxillo, Bauer, & Leo, 2002). Nolan (2001) has noted that mandatory drug testing is a controversial issue due to its invasiveness and perceived disrespectfulness toward employees.…”
Section: Attitudes Toward Testingmentioning
confidence: 98%