2015
DOI: 10.1038/srep17417
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drug target prioritization by perturbed gene expression and network information

Abstract: Drugs bind to their target proteins, which interact with downstream effectors and ultimately perturb the transcriptome of a cancer cell. These perturbations reveal information about their source, i.e., drugs’ targets. Here, we investigate whether these perturbations and protein interaction networks can uncover drug targets and key pathways. We performed the first systematic analysis of over 500 drugs from the Connectivity Map. First, we show that the gene expression of drug targets is usually not significantly… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
130
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(138 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
8
130
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most affected proteins are not the direct target proteins of the given drugs, since they placed in the lower levels, most commonly in the 3 rd level, of the tree. This result was also found in recent studies [9], [10]. These proteins have activities in the distant parts of signaling pathways and showed the most remarkable reactions in this pathway after the application of drug treatments.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most affected proteins are not the direct target proteins of the given drugs, since they placed in the lower levels, most commonly in the 3 rd level, of the tree. This result was also found in recent studies [9], [10]. These proteins have activities in the distant parts of signaling pathways and showed the most remarkable reactions in this pathway after the application of drug treatments.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Therefore, signaling pathway and interaction network analysis became more attractive to give a new perspective for the classic analysis of gene expression data [14]- [16]. New algorithms have started to highlight important regulator proteins and International Journal of Bioscience, Biochemistry and Bioinformatics cellular processes in pathways; such results had not been found by applying naive differentially expression analysis [9], [17]- [20].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these methods are built ad hoc to solve a specific problem. Many of these approaches have been proposed for the identification of novel gene-disease potential associations [10] or drug-disease associations for drug repositioning [11]. These methods usually focus more on the data sources integrated into the network than on the algorithm used to propagate the information within and/or accross networks, or they provide an algorithm that is tightly coupled to the data sources in use.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the data predicted in in silico approaches would be recorded into HEDD, such as molecular docking, virtual screening, pharmacophore modeling, molecular dynamics and similarity searching. As a resource to study the potential roles of epigenetic drugs in remodeling epigenetic modification, HEDD could be extended with utilities for the identification and confirmation of targets (genes and pathways) related to epigenetic drugs from large-scale high-throughput data (such as gene expression) (42, 43). Since mice are very important for modeling diseases and testing drugs, we would extend the research scope and integrate high-throughput data for mice treated with epigenetic drugs into HEDD.…”
Section: Database Use and Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%