2017
DOI: 10.1208/s12248-017-0148-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drug Target Interference in Immunogenicity Assays: Recommendations and Mitigation Strategies

Abstract: Abstract.Sensitive and specific methodology is required for the detection and characterization of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs). High-quality ADA data enables the evaluation of potential impact of ADAs on the drug pharmacokinetic profile, patient safety, and efficacious response to the drug. Immunogenicity assessments are typically initiated at early stages in preclinical studies and continue throughout the drug development program. One of the potential bioanalytical challenges encountered with ADA testing is th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(57 reference statements)
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Failure to observe ADAs in patients with JIA or uveitis in our study may indicate a reduced propensity for ADA formation in this patient population, or is more likely to be related to the maintenance of higher trough concentrations [29]. An alternative explanation may be that higher cumulative IFX dosing in JIA and uveitis may have resulted in higher IFX trough concentrations that potentially masked ADA detection by GRA or immunoassay in these patients [30]. Even though the immunoassay we used included an acid-dissociation step that significantly increases the drug tolerance of the assay, drug tolerance is one inherent limitation of studies examining ADAs [31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Failure to observe ADAs in patients with JIA or uveitis in our study may indicate a reduced propensity for ADA formation in this patient population, or is more likely to be related to the maintenance of higher trough concentrations [29]. An alternative explanation may be that higher cumulative IFX dosing in JIA and uveitis may have resulted in higher IFX trough concentrations that potentially masked ADA detection by GRA or immunoassay in these patients [30]. Even though the immunoassay we used included an acid-dissociation step that significantly increases the drug tolerance of the assay, drug tolerance is one inherent limitation of studies examining ADAs [31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…As with all types of ADA, the detection of NAb is also greatly influenced by the performance characteristics of the assay adopted. Different formats of NAb assays exist and, most commonly, they have lower sensitivity and drug tolerance than the screening or confirmatory ADA assays ( 29 , 30 ). These technical limitations provide the main explanation for why, in many cases, a relatively low percentage of ADA+ patients have detectable NAb.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to determine the suitability of the method for assessing cross-reactivity between anti-PCSK9 mAbs, recombinant PCSK9 (rPCSK9, Pfizer Inc) was used as a surrogate cross-reactive positive control because an antibody-positive control capable of binding to all three anti-PCSK9 mAbs was not available. The selection of rPCSK9 was based on the fact that bridging ADA assay formats are susceptible to false positivity by multimeric soluble targets, which can mimic an ADA response by bridging the labeled drugs [32]. PCSK9 is known to self-associate to form dimers and trimers [33], and a concentration-dependent increase in the assay signal with an aggregated form of rPCSK9 was demonstrated in the bococizumab ADA screening assay (Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%