2019
DOI: 10.1097/qad.0000000000002284
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drug resistance and optimizing dolutegravir regimens for adolescents and young adults failing antiretroviral therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a cross-sectional study conducted between June 2018 and September 2019, we evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of the PANDAA assay in detecting major DRMs (Ն20%) compared to standard GRT by Sanger sequencing and in detecting low-level (Ͻ20%) major DRMs compared to next-generation sequencing (NGS). We used plasma samples collected during a randomized clinical trial at the Parirenyatwa Hospital HIV ART treatment clinic (OI clinic) in Harare, Zimbabwe, as previously described (5).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a cross-sectional study conducted between June 2018 and September 2019, we evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of the PANDAA assay in detecting major DRMs (Ն20%) compared to standard GRT by Sanger sequencing and in detecting low-level (Ͻ20%) major DRMs compared to next-generation sequencing (NGS). We used plasma samples collected during a randomized clinical trial at the Parirenyatwa Hospital HIV ART treatment clinic (OI clinic) in Harare, Zimbabwe, as previously described (5).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, children and adolescents were changed from nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor fixed dose combinations of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and lamivudine to abacavir and lamivudine in second-line. The response to a new nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor in the presence of the drug resistance mutations M184V and K65R is predicted to be sub-optimal [ 23 ]. Nevertheless, the response to lopinavir/ritonavir or atazanavir/ritonavir and 2 nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors is consistent with studies of adults in Africa where nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor resistance has been found to have little impact on second-line protease inhibitor-based regimens [ 50 54 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies in LMICs have shown that virologic failure of first-line ART is associated with reverse transcriptase inhibitor resistance [21][22][23]46]. Switching from a first-line non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-based regimen to a second-line protease inhibitor-based regimen calls for continued administration of lamivudine and substitution of a new nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor in the new regimen [10].…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Published data emanating from SA estimate that ~25% of the ~145 000 people receiving SLART experience treatment failure within 1 year as a result of treatment nonadherence, subtherapeutic ART, delayed switching, and accumulation of PI-resistant mutations. [2,5,6] Although these data are from the predolutegravir (DTG) era, the growing pool of patients urgently needing TLART requires innovative systems to ensure that patients receiving TLART are alive, engaged in care, and virologically suppressed for the duration of their treatment.…”
Section: Editorialmentioning
confidence: 99%