2007
DOI: 10.1177/0038038507074717
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drug-related Deaths and the ‘Special Deaths’ of Late Modernity

Abstract: The literature on dying and bereavement has long recognized that the features of some deaths make them especially difficult to grieve.The defining features of such deaths and bereavement are that there is often a high level of trauma, they may be socially stigmatizing or existentially problematic, and the grief is frequently 'disenfranchized'.These deaths are special because they occur outside of attempts to create ontological security that have been suggested as a central feature of late modernity. In this ar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Where this is lacking, due to social censure in the wider environment, and/or disrupted due to lack of communication within the more immediate family, then emotional isolation may result (Grace, 2012;Simone, 2012;Wright and Coyle, 1996). Guy and Holloway (2007) have suggested that the social censuring of such deaths has, in part, to do with their lack of predictability and capacity to be managed, in contrast to most other forms of dying, which are subject to particular procedures and pathways and, as such, capable of being managed (see below). However, with substance misuse deaths, any attempt to construct a coherent and meaningful dying trajectory may be inhibited by popular myths and negative stereotyping of substance misuse, including images and assumptions attached to the user, which take little account of the person behind the image.…”
Section: Stigmatised Deaths and Devalued Griefmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Where this is lacking, due to social censure in the wider environment, and/or disrupted due to lack of communication within the more immediate family, then emotional isolation may result (Grace, 2012;Simone, 2012;Wright and Coyle, 1996). Guy and Holloway (2007) have suggested that the social censuring of such deaths has, in part, to do with their lack of predictability and capacity to be managed, in contrast to most other forms of dying, which are subject to particular procedures and pathways and, as such, capable of being managed (see below). However, with substance misuse deaths, any attempt to construct a coherent and meaningful dying trajectory may be inhibited by popular myths and negative stereotyping of substance misuse, including images and assumptions attached to the user, which take little account of the person behind the image.…”
Section: Stigmatised Deaths and Devalued Griefmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literature on dying and bereavement in contemporary western societies has identified some deaths as being especially difficult to grieve due to circumstances and characteristics which place the death beyond the bounds of normal expectation and acceptability (Guy, 2007;Seale, 2004). These include deaths which are considered to be 'out of time' and therefore unpredictable, disruptive and hard to manage.…”
Section: Norms About Dying and Grievingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gossip about the cause of death (was it suicide, an accident or an overdose?) that may be relatively confined in a pub or bar becomes on social media visible for all to join in, to speculate further and to cause pain to the deceased's close family; this is most likely with "bad" deaths (Guy & Holloway, 2007) after which gossip and speculation can stigmatise the surviving family as much as the death itself.…”
Section: Conflictmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…() have challenged this, highlighting how family members have their own needs for support as they struggle to cope with what alcohol or drugs are doing to their family (Barnard ; UKDPC, ). When users die, families ‘frequently attract public interest and media attention, but supporting the bereaved in their grief is rarely of paramount concern’ (Guy & Holloway , p. 86). Some drug and alcohol treatment agencies work with families but typically lose contact once the client has died; bereavement agencies rarely have expertise in drug and alcohol issues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%