Abstract:Drug-induced cholestasis (DIC) is a major cause of clinical failure of drug candidates. Numerous patients worldwide are affected when exposed to marketed drugs exhibiting a DIC signature. Prospective identification of DIC during early compound development remains challenging. Here we describe the optimized
in vitro
procedure for early assessment and prediction of an increased DIC risk. Our method is based on three principles:
Exposure of primary human hepatocyte cultures … Show more
“…We previously introduced a holistic in vitro screening assay to investigate the cholestatic propensity of a given compound. In this assay, bosentan was not identified as cholestatic at concentrations up to 200 µM (Chatterjee, Richert, et al, 2014;Oorts et al, 2016;Van Brantegem et al, 2020). In order to explain this result, the present study aimed to explore the mechanisms governing the bosentan-induced disturbance in bile salt homeostasis in SCHH.…”
Bosentan, a well-known cholestatic agent, was not identified as cholestatic at concentrations up to 200 µM based on the drug-induced cholestasis (DIC) index value, determined in a sandwichcultured human hepatocyte (SCHH)-based DIC assay. To obtain further quantitative insights into the effects of bosentan on cellular bile salt handling by human hepatocytes, the present study determined the effect of 2.5-25 µM bosentan on endogenous bile salt levels and on the disposition of 10 µM chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA) added to the medium in SCHH. Bosentan reduced intracellular as well as extracellular concentrations of both endogenous glycochenodeoxycholic acid (GCDCA) and glycocholic acid in a concentration-dependent manner. When exposed to 10 µM CDCA, bosentan caused a shift from canalicular efflux to sinusoidal efflux of GCDCA. CDCA levels were not affected. Our mechanistic model confirmed the inhibitory effect of bosentan on canalicular GCDCA clearance. Moreover, our results in SCHH also indicated reduced GCDCA formation. We confirmed the direct inhibitory effect of bosentan on CDCA conjugation with glycine in liver S9 fraction.
“…We previously introduced a holistic in vitro screening assay to investigate the cholestatic propensity of a given compound. In this assay, bosentan was not identified as cholestatic at concentrations up to 200 µM (Chatterjee, Richert, et al, 2014;Oorts et al, 2016;Van Brantegem et al, 2020). In order to explain this result, the present study aimed to explore the mechanisms governing the bosentan-induced disturbance in bile salt homeostasis in SCHH.…”
Bosentan, a well-known cholestatic agent, was not identified as cholestatic at concentrations up to 200 µM based on the drug-induced cholestasis (DIC) index value, determined in a sandwichcultured human hepatocyte (SCHH)-based DIC assay. To obtain further quantitative insights into the effects of bosentan on cellular bile salt handling by human hepatocytes, the present study determined the effect of 2.5-25 µM bosentan on endogenous bile salt levels and on the disposition of 10 µM chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA) added to the medium in SCHH. Bosentan reduced intracellular as well as extracellular concentrations of both endogenous glycochenodeoxycholic acid (GCDCA) and glycocholic acid in a concentration-dependent manner. When exposed to 10 µM CDCA, bosentan caused a shift from canalicular efflux to sinusoidal efflux of GCDCA. CDCA levels were not affected. Our mechanistic model confirmed the inhibitory effect of bosentan on canalicular GCDCA clearance. Moreover, our results in SCHH also indicated reduced GCDCA formation. We confirmed the direct inhibitory effect of bosentan on CDCA conjugation with glycine in liver S9 fraction.
“…Despite the fact that intracellular BA accumulation is a clear marker for cholestasis, none of these studies considered the composition of BA on DIC development. Some studies do take into account the important role of human BAs in DIC in vitro (Chatterjee et al 2014 ; Hendriks et al 2016 ; Ogimura et al 2017 ; Van Brantegem et al 2020 ; Shinozawa et al 2021 ) and in vivo (Boer et al 2019 ). Most in vitro models, however, do not include the tissue complexity of the PCLS model, which allows for the more faithful tissue response required in multifactorial conditions like cholestasis (Vatakuti et al 2017 ; Starokozhko et al 2017a ).…”
Drugs are often withdrawn from the market due to the manifestation of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) in patients. Drug-induced cholestasis (DIC), defined as obstruction of hepatic bile flow due to medication, is one form of DILI. Because DILI is idiosyncratic, and the resulting cholestasis complex, there is no suitable in vitro model for early DIC detection during drug development. Our goal was to develop a mouse precision-cut liver slice (mPCLS) model to study DIC and to assess cholestasis development using conventional molecular biology and analytical chemistry methods. Cholestasis was induced in mPCLS through a 48-h-incubation with three drugs known to induce cholestasis in humans, namely chlorpromazine (15, 20, and 30 µM), cyclosporin A (1, 3, and 6 µM) or glibenclamide (25, 50, and 65 µM). A bile-acid mixture (16 µM) that is physiologically representative of the human bile-acid pool was added to the incubation medium with drug, and results were compared to incubations with no added bile acids. Treatment of PCLS with cholestatic drugs increased the intracellular bile-acid concentration of deoxycholic acid and modulated bile-transporter genes. Chlorpromazine led to the most pronounced cholestasis in 48 h, observed as increased toxicity; decreased protein and gene expression of the bile salt export pump; increased gene expression of multidrug resistance-associated protein 4; and accumulation of intracellular bile acids. Moreover, chlorpromazine-induced cholestasis exhibited some transition into fibrosis, evidenced by increased gene expression of collagen 1A1 and heatshock protein 47. In conclusion, we demonstrate that mPCLS can be used to study human DIC onset and progression in a 48 h period. We thus propose this model is suited for other similar studies of human DIC.
“…The drug-induced cholestasis (DIC) assay has been developed to distinguish cholestatic compounds from hepatotoxic non-cholestatic and non-hepatotoxic compounds based on their potential to modulate BA disposition in a sandwich-cultured human hepatocytes in vitro model. This assay enables early assessment and prediction of an increased DIC risk [ 103 ] as well as the determination of the drug-induced cholestatic index (DICI). The DICI relies on the ratio of urea produced by the sandwich-cultured human hepatocytes exposed to test compound in the absence or presence of a BA mixture.…”
Section: Liver-specific Toxicity In Vitro Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DICI relies on the ratio of urea produced by the sandwich-cultured human hepatocytes exposed to test compound in the absence or presence of a BA mixture. A DICI cut-off value of 0.78 is used to correlate obtained in vitro results with an in vivo safety margin [ 103 ]. The use of sandwich-cultured human hepatocytes has the advantage of preserving both phenotype and liver-specific functions for prolonged periods of time.…”
Section: Liver-specific Toxicity In Vitro Methodsmentioning
The liver is among the most frequently targeted organs by noxious chemicals of diverse nature. Liver toxicity testing using laboratory animals not only raises serious ethical questions, but is also rather poorly predictive of human safety towards chemicals. Increasing attention is, therefore, being paid to the development of non-animal and human-based testing schemes, which rely to a great extent on in vitro methodology. The present paper proposes a rationalized tiered in vitro testing strategy to detect liver toxicity triggered by chemicals, in which the first tier is focused on assessing general cytotoxicity, while the second tier is aimed at identifying liver-specific toxicity as such. A state-of-the-art overview is provided of the most commonly used in vitro assays that can be used in both tiers. Advantages and disadvantages of each assay as well as overall practical considerations are discussed.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.