2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-008-1285-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drug enhancement of memory consolidation: historical perspective and neurobiological implications

Abstract: Considerable evidence now indicates that such hormones regulate memory consolidation via activation of the basolateral amygdala and subsequent influences on many efferent brain regions involved in processing recent experiences. The implications of these findings for the development of cognitive enhancing drugs are discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

10
134
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 215 publications
(146 citation statements)
references
References 144 publications
(137 reference statements)
10
134
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…18). Thus, it is most likely that the HDAC inhibitor effects on memory are not because of effects on performance, which is a critical factor in studies examining memory enhancements/impairments (22)(23)(24). In a previous study, we showed that the transformation of hippocampal E-LTP into a transcription-dependent form of LTP by HDAC inhibition depended on the interaction between CBP and cyclicAMP response-element binding protein (CREB), a transcription factor (18).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18). Thus, it is most likely that the HDAC inhibitor effects on memory are not because of effects on performance, which is a critical factor in studies examining memory enhancements/impairments (22)(23)(24). In a previous study, we showed that the transformation of hippocampal E-LTP into a transcription-dependent form of LTP by HDAC inhibition depended on the interaction between CBP and cyclicAMP response-element binding protein (CREB), a transcription factor (18).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One would therefore need an account with mechanisms that prevent a labile memory from being updated with the new information that occurs during the extinction trial. Some studies suggest that even minimally invasive procedures during periods of memory consolidation can strengthen the fear response (Hui et al 2006), as can other behavioral and pharmacological enhancements of the stress response (McGaugh 2006;McGaugh and Roozendaal 2009). Thus, the simple experience of being returned to a fearful context while the organism is in an aroused state may prevent extinction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, effective parameters for other downstream targets may differ. Although a 3-h post-training control experiment was conducted for the inhibition work in order to exclude the possibility that the inhibition was producing longlasting dysfunction in the circuit, we did not perform a similar control with the stimulation experiments, as studies using pharmacological manipulations to produce memory enhancement do not observe effects on retention when given 3 h after training (McGaugh and Roozendaal 2009). Nonetheless, although unlikely, it is possible that the stimulation-induced memory enhancement occurred as a result of effects of the stimulation on performance during the retention test 2 d later, rather than on the memory consolidation.…”
Section: Methodological Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rats expressing eArchT3.0 received continuous optical inhibition of the BLA VH pathway for 15 min following context or footshock training, with different delays following the training. Because it was possible that the optical manipulations for the inhibition experiments were producing long-lasting dysfunction in the BLA VH circuit that was responsible for the reduced latencies at the retention test, we conducted a control experiment in which the manipulation was given 3 h after training, when the consolidation window is typically observed to be closed (McGaugh and Roozendaal 2009). We did not conduct a similar control experiment with the stimulation study, as it was considered unlikely that dysfunction in the circuit created by stimulation was responsible for the observed increase in latencies at the retention test.…”
Section: Earcht30 Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation