: First-generation drug-eluting stents DESs have reduced angiographic and clinical restenosis rates compared to bare-metal stents BMSs . Zotarolimus-eluting stents ZESs are second-generation drug-eluting stents : however, the clinical ef cacy of ZES implantation is unclear because late loss associated with ZESs is reportedly higher than that observed for other DESs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical ef cacy of ZESs compared to paclitaxel-eluting stents PESs . We retrospectively evaluated the angiographic and clinical outcomes of 431 lesions in 342 patients treated with PESs and 153 lesions in 121 patients treated with ZESs in our hospital between May 2007 and December 2010. Follow-up angiographic examinations were performed eight months post-treatment and clinical outcomes were assessed one year after the procedure. Quantitative coronary angiographic analyses showed that late loss was signi cantly higher for ZESs than PESs 0.82 0.73 mm vs 0.47 0.68 mm ; P 0.003 . However, there was no signi cant difference in target lesion revascularization TLR between the two groups ZES : 15 lesions, 9.8 vs PES : 25 lesions, 5.8 ; P 0.092 . When comparing stents according to the American College of Cardiology / American Heart Association ACC / AHA lesion type, the TLR rate in the ZES group was signi cantly lower than in the PES group 0 vs 7.0 ; P 0.038 for Type A / B1 lesions, but the TLR rate for type B2 / C lesions in the ZES group was signi cantly higher than in the PES group 15.8 vs 5.3 ; P 0.009 . Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that dialysis OR : 35.54 ; 95 CI : 3.15-400.67 ; P 0.039 and pre-minimal lumen diameter OR : 0.036 ; 95 CI : 0.002-0.541 ; P 0.016 were independent predictors of TLR in ZES-treated lesions. However, no factors predicted TLR in PES-treated lesions. Our study demonstrated excellent outcomes with ZESs for simple lesions, but it is necessary to carefully implant ZESs in complex lesions, such as ACC / AHA type B2 / C lesions..