2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.09.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drug-eluting balloon versus standard percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in infrapopliteal arterial disease: A meta-analysis of randomized trials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
7
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A previous meta-analysis of 3 RCTs comparing DCB with BA exclusively in patients with CLTI and infrapopliteal lesions demonstrated no difference between the groups in terms of major adverse events (ie, death, major amputation, Rutherford category ≥4), TLR, or late restenosis; however, the degree of stenosis was less severe for the DCB group. 59 Similarly, in our study, sensitivity analyses among patients with infrapopliteal lesions demonstrated that the 12-month primary patency, TLR, major amputation, and mortality were not different between the DCB and BA groups, indicating that although reocclusions occurred less frequently among patients treated with DCBs there was still a need for TLR. Additionally, our meta-analysis provided very similar results to the recent preliminary 6-month study with Lutonix DCB (12.1% TLR, 8.8% mortality, and 2.9% major amputation), supporting the conclusion that DCB angioplasty appears safe for infrapopliteal lesions but has uncertain efficacy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…A previous meta-analysis of 3 RCTs comparing DCB with BA exclusively in patients with CLTI and infrapopliteal lesions demonstrated no difference between the groups in terms of major adverse events (ie, death, major amputation, Rutherford category ≥4), TLR, or late restenosis; however, the degree of stenosis was less severe for the DCB group. 59 Similarly, in our study, sensitivity analyses among patients with infrapopliteal lesions demonstrated that the 12-month primary patency, TLR, major amputation, and mortality were not different between the DCB and BA groups, indicating that although reocclusions occurred less frequently among patients treated with DCBs there was still a need for TLR. Additionally, our meta-analysis provided very similar results to the recent preliminary 6-month study with Lutonix DCB (12.1% TLR, 8.8% mortality, and 2.9% major amputation), supporting the conclusion that DCB angioplasty appears safe for infrapopliteal lesions but has uncertain efficacy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…The RCTs comparing paclitaxel coated balloons with standard PTA were BIOLUX P-II, 10 IN.PACT DEEP, 11 DEBATE-BTK, 12 Lutonix BTK, 34 as well as a trial by Haddad et al including a total of 1097 patients. 35 Twelve month mortality was reported as 9.4% vs. 6 36 Similarly, a Cochrane analysis from 2016 including femoropopliteal and BK interventions did not find any significant difference for amputation or death in a subgroup analysis of BK and CLTI patients at 12 month follow up. 37 In contrast, this PS matched cohort revealed a PCX related reduction of all cause mortality, lower risk of amputation or death, and lower risk of cardiovascular Table 2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Current clinical treatments primarily involve medical therapy (thrombolytic drugs and vasodilator drugs [1]) and surgery [2]. However, it remains difficult to achieve the purpose of vascular remodeling using either drugs [3] or surgery [4]. Inspired by the fact that the body undergoes natural angiogenesis in response to an insufficient blood supply, scientists have learned to enhance the efficiency of angiogenesis as a treatment strategy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%