2018
DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciy201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drug–Drug Interaction Studies Between Hepatitis C Virus Antivirals Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir and Boosted and Unboosted Human Immunodeficiency Virus Antiretroviral Regimens in Healthy Volunteers

Abstract: SOF/VEL and ARV regimens including ATV, COBI, DRV, DTG, EVG, FTC, LPV, RAL, RPV, RTV, TAF, or TDF may be coadministered without dose adjustment. Use of SOF/VEL with EFV-containing regimens is not recommended due to an approximate 50% reduction in VEL exposure.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Coadministration of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir with TDF-containing regimens resulted in higher TFV exposures from EFV/FTC/TDF (AUC 98% higher; C max 79% higher) and FTC/rilpivirine (RPV)/TDF (AUC 40% higher); similar increases in TFV exposure (approximately 40%) were observed with other regimens, including ritonavir-boosted ATV or darunavir (DRV) plus FTC/TDF (Harvoni, 2017b). Coadministration of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir with boosted and unboosted TDF-containing regimens resulted in similar effects on TFV (approximately 40% higher AUC and C max for all regimens except EFV/FTC/TDF; TFV AUC 81% higher) (Mogalian et al, 2015a(Mogalian et al, , 2016a(Mogalian et al, ,c, 2018. The relatively larger changes in TFV seen with EFV/FTC/TDF compared with other regimens are due to comparatively lower TFV exposure when administered as EFV/FTC/TDF, which is recommended to be given on an empty stomach.…”
Section: Nucleoside/nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitorsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Coadministration of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir with TDF-containing regimens resulted in higher TFV exposures from EFV/FTC/TDF (AUC 98% higher; C max 79% higher) and FTC/rilpivirine (RPV)/TDF (AUC 40% higher); similar increases in TFV exposure (approximately 40%) were observed with other regimens, including ritonavir-boosted ATV or darunavir (DRV) plus FTC/TDF (Harvoni, 2017b). Coadministration of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir with boosted and unboosted TDF-containing regimens resulted in similar effects on TFV (approximately 40% higher AUC and C max for all regimens except EFV/FTC/TDF; TFV AUC 81% higher) (Mogalian et al, 2015a(Mogalian et al, , 2016a(Mogalian et al, ,c, 2018. The relatively larger changes in TFV seen with EFV/FTC/TDF compared with other regimens are due to comparatively lower TFV exposure when administered as EFV/FTC/TDF, which is recommended to be given on an empty stomach.…”
Section: Nucleoside/nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitorsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Consistent with EFV-mediated CYP3A induction, lower plasma exposure of simeprevir (AUC 71% lower) was observed after coadministration of EFV single agent (Ouwerkerk-Mahadevan et al, 2012a). A decrease in the velpatasvir AUC (53%) was also observed after coadministration of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir with EFV/FTC/TDF, although no impact of sofosbuvir AUC was observed (Mogalian et al, 2015a). Due to a potential loss of therapeutic effect, coadministration of simeprevir or sofosbuvir/velpatasvir with EFVbased regimens is not recommended (Olysio, 2017).…”
Section: Non-nrtismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VEL AUC was reduced 50% with TDF/emtricitabine/efavirenz. SOF/VEL increased tenofovir exposures by 40%-81% [47]. VEL AUC was increased by 2.4 fold with ritonavir-boosted atazanavir, and was also increased 20%-30% in the presence of cobicistat-containing regimens.…”
Section: Simeprevirmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…VEL AUC was increased by 2.4 fold with ritonavir-boosted atazanavir, and was also increased 20%-30% in the presence of cobicistat-containing regimens. When TDF was administered with SOF/VEL, there was a 20%-40% increase in tenofovir AUC [47]. As with LDV, this could be problematic in individuals receiving TDF with other agents that raise tenofovir exposures, but TAF is an alternative to TDF in this scenario.…”
Section: Simeprevirmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Velpatasvir is metabolized by CYP3A4, CYP2C8, and CYP2B6, and is a substrate of the transporters Pgp, BCRP, OAT1B1 and OAT1B3 on which it exerts mild inhibitory action [23,24]. Thus, velpatasvir is more a candidate victim of cytochrome P450 enzymes rather than a relevant perpetrator of drug-drug interactions.…”
Section: Velpatasvirmentioning
confidence: 99%