2016
DOI: 10.1089/adt.2015.670
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drug Discovery Approaches Utilizing Three-Dimensional Cell Culture

Abstract: Historically, two-dimensional (2D) cell culture has been the preferred method of producing disease models in vitro. Recently, there has been a move away from 2D culture in favor of generating three-dimensional (3D) multicellular structures, which are thought to be more representative of the in vivo environment. This transition has brought with it an influx of technologies capable of producing these structures in various ways. However, it is becoming evident that many of these technologies do not perform well i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
73
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
1
73
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It is well established for cells of various origins [13, 3739], including medulloblastoma [25, 26], that cells cultured in 2D differ from those in 3D cultures. We compared the expression profiles of three differentiation and stem cell markers in ONS-76 cells grown in 2D monolayers and in 3D hydrogels with MAX8 and RGDS-tagged MAX8 cell constructs (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is well established for cells of various origins [13, 3739], including medulloblastoma [25, 26], that cells cultured in 2D differ from those in 3D cultures. We compared the expression profiles of three differentiation and stem cell markers in ONS-76 cells grown in 2D monolayers and in 3D hydrogels with MAX8 and RGDS-tagged MAX8 cell constructs (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus far, there are several different approaches to creating a 3D HTS method, but each comes with its own set of challenges and difficulties [1, 3739]. The best studied methods employ spheroids or hydrogels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current model systems primarily rely on the monolayer cell cultures and animal models. Simplistic monolayer cultures have their advantages, but they are often significantly different in gene expression, epigenetics, and cell function compared to native 3D tissues . Also, they often lack cell–cell and cell–matrix interactions, leading to the absence of tissue specific properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simplistic monolayer cultures have their advantages, but they are often significantly different in gene expression, epigenetics, and cell function compared to native 3D tissues . Also, they often lack cell–cell and cell–matrix interactions, leading to the absence of tissue specific properties. Although animal models are widely used in biomedical research, they fail to faithfully predict human responses in a physiologically relevant manner due to the significant species divergences .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 3D cell-based experiments mimic tumors in some aspects and hence can be used as preliminary investigations before in vivo studies[3436]. The hanging drop method of obtaining spheroids is advantageous because of its simplicity and reproducibility; moreover, these spheroids resemble tissue[37] unlike in other methods such as extracellular matrix (ECM) scaffolds and hydrogel systems.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%