Drug Calculation Errors in Anesthesiology Residents and Faculty: An Analysis of Contributing Factors

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Limited data exist regarding computational drug error rates in anesthesia residents and faculty. We investigated the frequency and magnitude of computational errors in a sample of anesthesia residents and faculty. METHODS: With institutional review board approval from 7 academic institutions in the United States, a 15-question computational test was distributed during rounds. Error rates and the magnitude of the errors were analyzed according to resident versus faculty, years of practice (or residency training), duration of sleep, type of question, and institution. RESULTS: A total of 371 completed the test: 209 residents and 162 faculty. Both groups committed 2 errors (median value) per test, for a mean error rate of 17.0%. Twenty percent of residents and 25% of faculty scored 100% correct answers. The error rate for postgraduate year 2 residents was less than for postgraduate year 1 (P = .012). The error rate for faculty increased with years of experience, with a weak correlation (R = 0.22; P = .007). The error rates were independent of the number of hours of sleep. The error rate for percentage-type questions was greater than for rate, dose, and ratio questions (P = .001). The error rates varied with the number of operations needed to calculate the answer (P < .001). The frequency of large errors (100-fold greater or less than the correct answer) by residents was twice that of faculty. Error rates varied among institutions ranged from 12% to 22% (P = .021). CONCLUSIONS: Anesthesiology residents and faculty erred frequently on a computational test, with junior residents and faculty with more experience committing errors more frequently. Residents committed more serious errors twice as frequently as faculty.

To Dilute or Not Dilute: Drug Errors and Consequences in the Operating Room

“…Training and culture must also be considered. One study found that although both anesthesiology residents and faculty members erred frequently on a computational test, the residents committed serious errors twice as frequently as the faculty members 8 . Finally, the culture within the institution should be supportive and protective of personnel who report medication errors or near‐misses 3,6 .…”

An integrative review of method types used in the study of medication error during anaesthesia: implications for estimating incidence

“…37 A study by Avidan and co-workers 36 also highlighted the same issue by observing the ability of anaesthetists to calculate specific drug concentrations to administer in children, finding that only 6 out of 41 (14.6%) provided the correct answers. Black and co-workers 38 concluded that inexperienced trainees made the most errors in calculations.…”

Patient monitoring in the nonoperating room anesthesia (NORA) setting: current advances in technology

“…They may also communicate with a facility's electronic health record system. The goal of these smart pumps is to streamline pump programming and reduce errors, though the data regarding achievement of these goals are mixed [38][39][40]. Although not currently approved in the USA, target controlled infusion systems use an algorithm to account for medication accumulation and context-sensitive half time, changing the infusion rate throughout drug delivery to (ideally) maintain a constant depth of anesthesia [41].…”