1991
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(91)90440-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drug abuse screening of childbearing-age women in Alabama public health clinics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In various US studies, the prevalence of maternal cocaine use, based on urine tests and/or history reports, ranges from 0.3–19.7% in the general population, 1–7 but approaches 62% in women with no prenatal care. Few data are available on cocaine prevalence in Europe.…”
Section: Clinical Evidence Of Teratogenic Effects Of Cocaine On the Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In various US studies, the prevalence of maternal cocaine use, based on urine tests and/or history reports, ranges from 0.3–19.7% in the general population, 1–7 but approaches 62% in women with no prenatal care. Few data are available on cocaine prevalence in Europe.…”
Section: Clinical Evidence Of Teratogenic Effects Of Cocaine On the Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[19][20][21] The variation in drug use by race and age in the self reported data in our study population was consistent with findings from the statewide study of drug use in Alabama. 22 The lower prevalence of syphilis despite a higher prevalence of drug abuse among white women compared with black women in this study may also be the result of a relatively low prevalence of syphilis among white women before the increases in illicit drug use, as has been reported in the midwestern region of the United States. 23 In 1990, in Dayton, Ohio, the midwestern region of the United States which is in a region with the lowest syphilis rates, none of the 138 women who used crack tested positive for syphilis despite the fact that 93% of these women had multiple sexual partners.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 44%
“…[19][20][21] A statewide study of 2970 pregnant women in Alabama which used urine tests to detect illicit drug use indicated higher prevalence of illicit drug use (11.0%) than the prevalence rate in our study for the corresponding years. 22 For comparison of trends in drug abuse over time, state, or county specific data for Alabama are not available. The National Household Survey on Drug Abuse (NHSDA), which began collecting information on pregnancy in 1994, indicated that the prevalence of drug abuse by pregnant women for 1994 and 1995 combined (9.9%) 11 was slightly higher than that found in our study for 1994 (7.8%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early reports of substance use during pregnancy in rural communities were largely descriptive and have documented the prevalence of drugs of abuse. [10][11][12][13] The most common drugs of abuse between 1989 and 1999 were marijuana, opiates, and cocaine, followed by benzodiazepienes, barbituriates, and amphetamines. [10][11][12][13] Reports that appeared much later moved beyond prevalence data and instead described particular issues that affect rural pregnant women including smoking and its interaction with substance use during pregnancy, 14,15 intimate partner violence, 16 hepatitis C testing, 17 and access to treatment ( Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%