2022
DOI: 10.1109/tnsm.2021.3132491
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DRSIR: A Deep Reinforcement Learning Approach for Routing in Software-Defined Networking

Abstract: Traditional routing protocols employ limited information to make routing decisions which leads to slow adaptation to traffic variability and restricted support to the quality of service requirements of the applications. To address these shortcomings, in previous work, we proposed RSIR, a routing solution based on Reinforcement Learning (RL) in Software-Defined Networking (SDN). However, RL-based solutions usually suffer an increase in the learning process when dealing with large action and state spaces. This p… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the exploitation phase of the RNN, the selection of the next node in the NFE process is influenced by the individual excitation levels of each neuron. To determine neuron i's potential (qi), we can use (1).…”
Section: Cognitive Routing Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…During the exploitation phase of the RNN, the selection of the next node in the NFE process is influenced by the individual excitation levels of each neuron. To determine neuron i's potential (qi), we can use (1).…”
Section: Cognitive Routing Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the task of managing and running computer networks, the introduction of software defined networks (SDNs) marks a significant shift in strategy. SDN is a design approach that isolates the control plane (which decides on routing) from the data plane (which sends packets) [1]. Because of this split, network managers may more easily monitor and control network resources in a centralised, programmable fashion, which has several advantages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this method faces challenges related to constructing triples, ensuring the best overall migration efficiency under the current triple and shortening the time overhead of iteration. Considering that traditional routing method uses some information to implement forwarding operations, which cannot achieve rapid adaptation to traffic variability and ensure the QoS of the network, Casas-Velasco et al. (2021) proposed a DRL and SDN intelligent routing (DRSIR) method that considers state metrics such as the available bandwidth, latency and loss path priority to generate efficient intelligent routing paths adapted to variable traffic and used natural and synthetic traffic matrices to evaluate DRSIR through a simulation, significantly reducing the loss of packets and lowering the network delay cost.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this method faces challenges related to constructing triples, ensuring the best overall migration efficiency under the current triple, and shortening the time overhead of iteration. Considering that traditional routing uses some information to implement forwarding operations, which can not achieve rapid adaptation to traffic variability and ensure the QoS of the network, Casas-Velasco et al 33 proposed a DRL and SDN intelligent routing (DRSIR) method that considers state metrics such as available bandwidth, latency and loss path priority as the best routing to generate efficient intelligent routing adapted to variable traffic, and using natural and synthetic traffic matrix to evaluate DRSIR through simulation, significantly reduce the loss of packet and reduce the network delay cost. However, this method does not consider the influence of the future trend in network traffic state on network performance.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%