2015
DOI: 10.5465/ambpp.2015.16913abstract
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drowning in the Seas of Social Enterprise: A Model of Competing Legitimacies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The increased professionalization of resources is a factor that ought to lead to an improvement in the way that SEs are viewed. The literature recounts the perception of SEs as lacking authenticity (Weidner, et al, 2019;Ruebottom, 2013;Murphy, et al, 2018;Howorth & MacDonald, 2015) but we posit that as SEnts make greater use of their expert network resources (Allen, 2020) within their ecosystem, so this will improve their legitimacy, and this, in turn, will further expand the network of expert resurces that they are able to draw upon. Our work also suggests that this 'cycle of expert growth' can be greatly enhanced through schemes such as SE Places which serve to greatly improve the legitimacy of SEs (Samuel, 2018).…”
Section: Concluding Thoughtsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The increased professionalization of resources is a factor that ought to lead to an improvement in the way that SEs are viewed. The literature recounts the perception of SEs as lacking authenticity (Weidner, et al, 2019;Ruebottom, 2013;Murphy, et al, 2018;Howorth & MacDonald, 2015) but we posit that as SEnts make greater use of their expert network resources (Allen, 2020) within their ecosystem, so this will improve their legitimacy, and this, in turn, will further expand the network of expert resurces that they are able to draw upon. Our work also suggests that this 'cycle of expert growth' can be greatly enhanced through schemes such as SE Places which serve to greatly improve the legitimacy of SEs (Samuel, 2018).…”
Section: Concluding Thoughtsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Doherty, Haugh and Lyon (2014) synthesis of the literature indicates that this arises from financial pressures that can lead to compromise of SEs' social objectives (Grieco, Michelini and Lasevoli 2015;Litrico and Besharov 2019;Stevens et al 2015;Zainon et al 2014). Such mission drift is viewed as a substantial threat to SEs' legitimacy at a consumer, industrial and societal level (Howorth and Macdonald 2015;Murphy et al 2019;Weidner, Weber and Gobel 2019). Thus, the primary challenge that SEs face is that of reconciling their dual-mission of seeking to generate social value through commercial means (Bull 2008;Dees and Anderson 2006;Hai and Daft 2016;Smith et al 2012;Tracey and Phillips 2007) and the seemingly impossible task of maximizing both financial and social performance (Alegre 2015;Battilana and Lee 2014;Ebrahim, Battailana and Mair 2014;Sanders and McClellan 2014;Seanor et al 2014).…”
Section: Social Enterprise Legitimacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Understanding family businesses is not straightforward because it requires analysis of the complex interaction of family and firm, a context where, at its most basic, families emphasise relationships and businesses emphasise return on investment. Family businesses legitimately combine the social values of families with the performance values of business (Howorth, 2008). In this era when the corporate world is increasingly under scrutiny for its responsibilities and responsiveness, family businesses are particularly interesting for the insights they can provide into managing competing objectives effectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%