Plant Nutrition and Food Security in the Era of Climate Change 2022
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-822916-3.00014-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drought and nitrogen stress effects and tolerance mechanisms in tomato: a review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 196 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lobos et al (2016) demonstrated that although severe water limitation decreased fruit weight and crop production, the imposition of a 25% reduction in water did not negatively influence fruit quality and levels of antioxidants in blueberries. In the present study, data on total production (kg of fruits for four plots) are limited, although yield did not show significant differences between R1 and R2, a greater decrease was evident in Lungo (199 kg in L-R1 vs 182 in R2) and the weight of 100 fruits was significantly lower in R2 Lungo in comparison to R1 Lungo, in agreement with the fact that when fruit water accumulation is reduced, such as under water deficit, tomato fruit weight is decreased (Machado et al, 2022). It is also worth noting that the stress led to a significant upregulation of a gene coding for a sucrose synthase in fruits collected from R2 plants, in agreement with previous works looking at the gene expression of homologous genes in soybean and rice upon drought conditions (Du et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Lobos et al (2016) demonstrated that although severe water limitation decreased fruit weight and crop production, the imposition of a 25% reduction in water did not negatively influence fruit quality and levels of antioxidants in blueberries. In the present study, data on total production (kg of fruits for four plots) are limited, although yield did not show significant differences between R1 and R2, a greater decrease was evident in Lungo (199 kg in L-R1 vs 182 in R2) and the weight of 100 fruits was significantly lower in R2 Lungo in comparison to R1 Lungo, in agreement with the fact that when fruit water accumulation is reduced, such as under water deficit, tomato fruit weight is decreased (Machado et al, 2022). It is also worth noting that the stress led to a significant upregulation of a gene coding for a sucrose synthase in fruits collected from R2 plants, in agreement with previous works looking at the gene expression of homologous genes in soybean and rice upon drought conditions (Du et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…ABA-dependent pathways of stress response are implicated in both drought and nitrogen deficiency (Machado et al, 2022). Interestingly, 10 genes encoding PYR/PYL ABA receptors were differentially expressed in T270 root, most of them downregulated, compared to only 2 in T250, suggesting that repression of expression of PYLs may contribute to stress signal desensitization (Ali et al, 2021) in T270.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drought and N availability are perceived by root systems, leading to modifications of root architecture, with tomato primary root growth favored over lateral root development under water deficit, and a general inhibition of root growth in the case of low N (Abenavoli et al, 2016;Machado et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cabbage, head, Brassica oleracea var. capitata Evaluation of N harvest index, and selection criteria of growth parameters [46] Cassava, Manihot esculenta Genotype with improved N uptake was identified among 25 accessions, under low N conditions; Molecular analysis identified mechanisms for possible improved N uptake in efficient lines [18,122] Eggplant, Solanum melongena NUE efficient genotypes identified from germplasm collections and crosses [116,123] Lettuce, Lactuca sativa Evaluation of wild species, plasticity in response to environmental variables [46] Onion, Allium cepa NUE evaluation of landraces [118] Potato, Solanum tuberosum Identification of growth traits associated with NUE among a range of potato cultivars; Differential cultivar responses to N rates; cultivar selection and N efficiency under organic systems [12,46,83,124] Spinach, Spinacea oleracea Identification of QTLs for NUE [46] Tomato, Solanum lycopersicon High-NUE genotype identified among 14 landrace varieties; wild relative genotype identified with increased NUE under low N rates; Genotypes with improved NUE with potential use as rootstocks; greater N uptake in drought-tolerant cultivars [115,119,125,126]…”
Section: Crop Notes Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%