2019
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.5364
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drought and freezing vulnerability of the isolated hybrid aspen Populus x smithii relative to its parental species, P. tremuloides and P. grandidentata

Abstract: Aim We assessed the vulnerability of an isolated, relictual Pleistocene hybrid aspen population of conservation interest ( Populus x. smithii ) and the nearest populations of its parent species ( Populus grandidentata and Populus tremuloides ) to springtime post‐bud break freezing and growing season drought stress. Response to these stressors in the three taxa was compared in terms of avoidance and tolerance. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(87 reference statements)
3
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S6). This event was inferred from P. grandidentata to P. tremuloides and is consistent with previous reports of extensive hybridization and introgression between these two species (Deacon, et al 2019). A second migration edge was inferred from P. adenopoda to P. rotundifolia , which allowed us to explain 99.6% of the total variance (Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…S6). This event was inferred from P. grandidentata to P. tremuloides and is consistent with previous reports of extensive hybridization and introgression between these two species (Deacon, et al 2019). A second migration edge was inferred from P. adenopoda to P. rotundifolia , which allowed us to explain 99.6% of the total variance (Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Specifically, based on a modeling analysis (see Figure S1 in Supporting Information ), we show that the effective whole‐plant P50 is more likely to be lower than the segment P50 in the roots, and higher in the segments that are further away from the soil (i.e., closer to leaves). The P50 data for the other species are scarce (three data points for paper birch (Kattge et al., 2020); one for bigtooth aspen (Deacon et al., 2019), and none for white pine), although our estimates of P50 for paper birch and bigtooth aspen are still consistent with measurements.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 65%
“…(b) Measurements from the literature (data for red maple and paper birch are from the TRY database (Kattge et al., 2020); data for bigtooth aspen are from Deacon et al. (2019); no data have been found for white pine).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it has remained unclear whether freezing at these temperatures is actually sufficient to relativize leakage across samples varying in size and anatomy [26]. Furthermore, the temperature at which samples are boiled or heated and/or the time during which this temperature is reached are frequently not specified ( [10,12,17,[27][28][29], among others). And though autoclaving Fig.…”
Section: What Is the Best Way To Standardize Measurements Of Freezingmentioning
confidence: 99%