2007
DOI: 10.1063/1.2731434
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dropwise condensation on superhydrophobic surfaces with two-tier roughness

Abstract: Dropwise condensation can enhance heat transfer by an order of magnitude compared to film condensation. Superhydrophobicity appears ideal to promote continued dropwise condensation which requires rapid removal of condensate drops; however, such promotion has not been reported on engineered surfaces. This letter reports continuous dropwise condensation on a superhydrophobic surface with short carbon nanotubes deposited on micromachined posts, a two-tier texture mimicking lotus leaves. On such micro-/nanostructu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
287
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 322 publications
(300 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
5
287
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that, recently, Boreyko and Chen [29] reported a spontaneous drop removal as a result of surface energy released due to the drop coalescence during condensation. In contrast to our study, those coalescing water drops have large contact angle ≈170 o (as can be estimated from their movie and [22]), hence the pinning forces on the surface of the drop contact line are quite small, making possible spontaneous drop removal. In addition, the critical angle is  c (≈94 o ) <  (≈101 o ) [22], which means that the Cassie-Baxter state is the most favorable state.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 43%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Note that, recently, Boreyko and Chen [29] reported a spontaneous drop removal as a result of surface energy released due to the drop coalescence during condensation. In contrast to our study, those coalescing water drops have large contact angle ≈170 o (as can be estimated from their movie and [22]), hence the pinning forces on the surface of the drop contact line are quite small, making possible spontaneous drop removal. In addition, the critical angle is  c (≈94 o ) <  (≈101 o ) [22], which means that the Cassie-Baxter state is the most favorable state.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 43%
“…In contrast to our study, those coalescing water drops have large contact angle ≈170 o (as can be estimated from their movie and [22]), hence the pinning forces on the surface of the drop contact line are quite small, making possible spontaneous drop removal. In addition, the critical angle is  c (≈94 o ) <  (≈101 o ) [22], which means that the Cassie-Baxter state is the most favorable state. In contrast, in our case, the critical angle is  c (≈135 o ) >  (≈75 o ) , making the Wenzel state the most favorable state.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 43%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In principle, any sub-microscale structures with a small feature size (tip size and interspace) and a certain height (or depth) can become effective candidates for creating CMDSP surfaces. In fact, except for arrays of closely packed nanotips, including nanocones, [22,27,50,69,70] nanoneedles, [21,28,31,66,71] nanopencils, [23] and tip-like nanotubes, [72,73] other architectures such as nano wires, [24,74] nanosheet arrays, [20,29,62,75] nanorod-capped nano pores, [68,76] the porous structure of nanoparticles, [67] nanoparticle aggregates, [73,[77][78][79][80] and two-tier structures [25,57,63,[81][82][83][84][85][86][87][88][89] have all been verified to be effective in endowing material surfaces with the desired CMDSP functionality as long as they follow these basic construction rules.…”
Section: Construction Rules Of Bionic Cmdsp Surfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the third condition for realizing hydrophobicity is to lower the surface energy of the solid and reduce the contact area of the liquid-solid interface as much as possible so as to reduce the flow resistance of liquid droplets on the solid surface. At present, this characteristic is often represented by the size of the rolling angle or the retardation angle [18], of which the two calculation methods are related to the values of the advance angle and the receding angle of the liquid droplets [19,20]. The authors of this study believe that this representation method did not reflect the internal causes affecting the hydrophobicity.…”
Section: The Effective Work Of Adhesionmentioning
confidence: 79%