2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10270-012-0284-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DropsBox: the Dresden Open Software Toolbox

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their approach allows the Object Constraint Language (OCL) to be used together with RAGs, for example to use attributes from within OCL constraints. They discuss that although OCL and RAGs both support static language semantics, their roles are complementary, with RAGs being well suited for computations distributed over complex nested syntactic structures and to compute complex values, whereas OCL is well suited for declaring constraints and providing user feedback [4].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Their approach allows the Object Constraint Language (OCL) to be used together with RAGs, for example to use attributes from within OCL constraints. They discuss that although OCL and RAGs both support static language semantics, their roles are complementary, with RAGs being well suited for computations distributed over complex nested syntactic structures and to compute complex values, whereas OCL is well suited for declaring constraints and providing user feedback [4].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…• a comparative evaluation of conciseness and performance (Section 4) Our experiments indicate that JavaRAG is up to ten times slower than JastAdd when running in steady state on a warmed up JVM, but only about twice as slow as JastAdd in JVM startup mode, i.e., when running from the command line. We think this performance is acceptable in many practical cases.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%