The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2008
DOI: 10.1097/brs.0b013e31817f1f8b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dropped Head Deformity due to Cervical Myopathy

Abstract: Surgical correction with posterior, instrumented C-T spinal fusion is associated with high patient satisfaction rates in CM patients with DHD. Complications are frequent but do not diminish long-term outcomes. New rod and screw instrumentation with bone morphogenic protein may improve arthrodesis and correction.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DCS is thought to be the results of cervical structural decompensation [ 21 , 22 ]. For some cases of (DCS) with flexion of the cervical vertebra, posterior neck muscles might be stretched and weaker than in the neutral and extension position, which might lead to an increased risk of developing anterior cervical sagittal imbalance, as decompensated cervical structures might be unable to provide adequate compensatory action to maintain the T1 slope, resulting in larger T1 slope in the patients with DCS [ 23 , 24 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DCS is thought to be the results of cervical structural decompensation [ 21 , 22 ]. For some cases of (DCS) with flexion of the cervical vertebra, posterior neck muscles might be stretched and weaker than in the neutral and extension position, which might lead to an increased risk of developing anterior cervical sagittal imbalance, as decompensated cervical structures might be unable to provide adequate compensatory action to maintain the T1 slope, resulting in larger T1 slope in the patients with DCS [ 23 , 24 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as it was clearly demonstrated in the current case, this formulation did not work and despite the plumb line falling posterior to manubrium, C2 to C7 instrumentation was insufficient and our construction failed. Therefore, it seems that it is better to extend the construct to the upper thoracic spine in all the patients who suffer from dropped head syndrome in isolation or as a combined pathology [ 2 , 3 , 14 , 17 19 ], in particular with consideration of the natural course of INEM which might be the progression of isolated myopathy to the muscles of the upper thoracic spine with time [ 18 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, extension to the cranium was gradually eliminated after description of C2-C1 transarticular screw and C2 pedicle screws [ 2 , 3 , 13 , 14 , 17 19 ]. Gerling and Bohlman in 2008 reported nine cases of DHS in the context of INEM that were managed with posterior instrumented fusion [ 18 ]. The surgical constructs for all patients spanned C2 to upper thoracic levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Treatment results with physical therapy, massage and acupuncture are inconsistent in cases series reports, 2 , 5 , 6 and most studies show little improvement with non-surgical management. 3 , 5 , 7 A collar can help the patient to maintain horizontal gaze and eye contact, and facilitate activities of daily living, although there are problems with compliance to the collar, skin pressure lesions and possible worsening of muscular weakness with prolonged use. 2 , 6 The goal of the surgical management of dropped-head syndrome is to improve quality of life by correcting the deformity, decompressing of neural elements when necessary and promoting long-term stabilization, 8 reating patients for whom conservative measures failed or for those who do not have treatable conditions as a cause for the dropped-head.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%