2017
DOI: 10.1101/199992
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Droplet-based microfluidic analysis and screening of single plant cells

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such approaches have mainly been applied in unicellular microorganisms. However, individual plant protoplasts can be captured within microfluidic chambers or spherical hydrogel beads (Nezhad, 2014; Grasso & Lintilhac, 2016) and microfluidic phenotyping of protoplasts has recently been reported (Yu et al , 2018). The development of on‐chip genetic manipulation and characterisation of plant cells is therefore technologically possible in the near‐term.…”
Section: Applying the Principles Of Engineering To Biologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such approaches have mainly been applied in unicellular microorganisms. However, individual plant protoplasts can be captured within microfluidic chambers or spherical hydrogel beads (Nezhad, 2014; Grasso & Lintilhac, 2016) and microfluidic phenotyping of protoplasts has recently been reported (Yu et al , 2018). The development of on‐chip genetic manipulation and characterisation of plant cells is therefore technologically possible in the near‐term.…”
Section: Applying the Principles Of Engineering To Biologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microfluidics can compartmentalize single cells within monodisperse picolitre‐sized droplets in a cost‐effective and high‐throughput process, for example, screening of 5 × 10 7 individual reactions requires only 150 µl of reagents and 7 h at an estimated cost of only a few dollars, as demonstrated by Agresti et al (2010). Over the past decades, droplet microfluidics has enabled single‐cell analysis for a wide range of applications across biological science, biomedicine and biochemistry (Agresti et al, 2010; Brouzes et al, 2009; Yu et al, 2018). This is because (1) the extracellular environments are accurately mimicked (Hosokawa et al, 2017; Liu et al, 2020); (2) the genotype‐phenotype linkages are established at a single‐cell level (Bowman & Alper, 2019; Fischlechner et al, 2014; S. Li, Giardina, et al, 2018; M. Li, van Zee, Goda, et al, 2018); (3) the miniaturized confinement improves the detection limit (Agresti et al, 2010; Zhu et al, 2012); and (4) massive parallel analysis can be conducted to probe cellular heterogeneity (Headen et al, 2018; Hindson et al, 2011; Klein et al, 2015; Ostafe et al, 2014; Zinchenko et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microfluidics can compartmentalize single cells within monodisperse picolitre-sized droplets in a cost-effective and high-throughput process, for example, screening of 5 × 10 7 individual reactions requires only 150 μL of reagents and seven hours at an estimated cost of only a few dollars, as demonstrated by Agresti et al (2010). Over the past decades, droplet microfluidics has enabled single-cell analysis for a wide range of applications across biological science, biomedicine and biochemistry (Agresti et al, 2010;Brouzes et al, 2009;Yu et al, 2018). This is because (1) the extracellular environments are accurately mimicked (Hosokawa et al, 2017;Liu et al, 2020); (2) the genotype-phenotype linkages are established at a single-cell level (Bowman and Alper, 2020;Fischlechner et al, 2014;Li et al, 2018aLi et al, , 2018b; (3) the miniaturized confinement improves the detection limit (Agresti et al, 2010;Zhu et al, 2012); and (4) massive parallel analysis can be conducted to probe cellular heterogeneity (Headen et al, 2018;Hindson et al, 2011;Klein et al, 2015;Ostafe et al, 2014;Zinchenko et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%