1981
DOI: 10.1002/esp.3290060310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drop testing aggregate stability of some soils near Merida, Spain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MWD was similar in RG and RS soils, and significantly higher (indicating that aggregates were more stable) in the secondary NG soils. Aggregate stability is an index of soil erodibility, since larger aggregates are less prone to erosion [34][35][36]. We can therefore infer that erosion will be lowest in areas that have been naturally revegetated, in accordance with previous findings that erosion moduli of cropland, RG, and RS soils of the Loess plateau are high (>15 000 t km À2 a À1 ) [37].…”
Section: Aggregate Stabilitysupporting
confidence: 89%
“…MWD was similar in RG and RS soils, and significantly higher (indicating that aggregates were more stable) in the secondary NG soils. Aggregate stability is an index of soil erodibility, since larger aggregates are less prone to erosion [34][35][36]. We can therefore infer that erosion will be lowest in areas that have been naturally revegetated, in accordance with previous findings that erosion moduli of cropland, RG, and RS soils of the Loess plateau are high (>15 000 t km À2 a À1 ) [37].…”
Section: Aggregate Stabilitysupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Instead, aggregates were wet by capillarity from the soil above, so that the percentage of larger aggregates in the ring samples was significantly higher (Table IV). A similar increase in aggregate size with depth below the rainimpacted surface was observed by Briggs (1974) for the &lo mm and 1&20 mm layers of a brown clay and the &5 mm and 5-10 mm layers of a krasnozem.…”
Section: Sampling Techniquesupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The stability of soil aggregates under rain is of major importance for surface sealing and runoff (Hoogmoed and Stroosnijder, 1984) and soil erodibility (Wischmeier and Mannering, 1969;Bryan, 1976). A wide range of tests have been developed to assess aggregate stability under rain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this procedure is not specifically designed to replicate the real world, it is generally felt desirable to have the aggregates wetted in some way (Bergsma and Valenzuela, 1981;Imeson and Jungerius, 1976). Also, work by Cousen and Farres (in press) shows that moisture content dictates time to breakdown, and the variation of those times about a measure of central tendency becomes smaller, i.e.…”
Section: The Nature Of' the Aggregate And R6le Of' Pretreatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The major difference between this and the McCalla approach is that the aggregates are prewetted to a known moisture tension, and the critical size of the aperture used to define breakdown is 3mm. Bergsma and Valenzuela (1981), De Meester and Jungerius (1978), Bruce-Okine and La1 (1975), and Grieve (1979), all use similar procedures with some variations in fall height, drop size, length of time for prewetting, rate of drop application, size of aperture to define breakdown, and definition of stable aggregates. These differences are summarized in Table I.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%