2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2019.115351
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drop impact on superhydrophobic surface with protrusions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since then, various ridges have been designed to corroborate this method. Jiang et al 18 analyzed the contact time reduction of a droplet impacting a surface with three different protrusions (semicircle, triangle, and square). They found that the contact time tended to be the same on the three combined surfaces with We > 5, all of which could be reduced to 65% of the smooth surface.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then, various ridges have been designed to corroborate this method. Jiang et al 18 analyzed the contact time reduction of a droplet impacting a surface with three different protrusions (semicircle, triangle, and square). They found that the contact time tended to be the same on the three combined surfaces with We > 5, all of which could be reduced to 65% of the smooth surface.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a droplet with low viscosity, the impact velocity and the cylinder size, represented by the Weber numbers ( We = 2ρ R 0 u 0 2 /σ, with u 0 referring to the initial velocity of the droplet) and the size ratio of the cylinder to the droplet ( R * = R cy / R 0 , where R cy refers to the cylinder radius), respectively, are two key factors affecting the dynamic behaviors of the droplet. For example, as We increases or R * decreases, the uneven distribution of the momentum becomes more pronounced, leading to a continuous reduction in contact time. ,, This feature is distinct from the constant value observed on smooth horizontal surfaces (τ c ≈ 2.6), or the discrete forms on flat substrates patterned with single-ridge (exhibiting a reduction rate of 25 and 50%) or submillimeter-scale posts (showing a reduction rate up to 80%) . In an extreme case where a much higher We is applied or R * is much smaller, the droplet will directly break into smaller fragments, splash from the cylinder, or pass through the cylinder and fall off the surface, undergoing almost no retraction process. , When disregarding the aforementioned particular situations, considerable efforts have been made to correlate the contact time with the given conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In a typical experiment, from a predetermined height (thereby varying the impact velocity), a drop with a specific diameter is released from a syringe pump needle. The drop impact behavior is monitored by a high-speed camera ( Figure 26 ) [ 188 ]. Post impact dynamics are not only a function of density, impact velocity and viscosity but also a function of surface roughness, geometry, wettability, and mechanical strength [ 188 ].…”
Section: Characterization Of the Static And Dynamic Wetting Propertie...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The drop impact behavior is monitored by a high-speed camera ( Figure 26 ) [ 188 ]. Post impact dynamics are not only a function of density, impact velocity and viscosity but also a function of surface roughness, geometry, wettability, and mechanical strength [ 188 ]. Y. Shen, et al [ 189 ] achieved the minimum contact time on a complex textured SH surface.…”
Section: Characterization Of the Static And Dynamic Wetting Propertie...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation