2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2021.126895
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drop impact of non-Newtonian dairy-based solutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7 A full list of calculated values of A for various combinations of fluids and surfaces when using the energy conservation approach is included in ESI †. The flat PDMS surface produced A = 1.24 ± 0.01 for all the fluids combined, a value very consistent with data collected by Laan et al 7 Elsewhere, two recent studies 49,50 have found values of A = 1.25 ± 0.1 and A = 1.21 ± 0.7 for non-Newtonian dairy product drop impacts on unstructured stainless steel.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…7 A full list of calculated values of A for various combinations of fluids and surfaces when using the energy conservation approach is included in ESI †. The flat PDMS surface produced A = 1.24 ± 0.01 for all the fluids combined, a value very consistent with data collected by Laan et al 7 Elsewhere, two recent studies 49,50 have found values of A = 1.25 ± 0.1 and A = 1.21 ± 0.7 for non-Newtonian dairy product drop impacts on unstructured stainless steel.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…7 A full list of calculated values of A for various combinations of fluids and surfaces when using the energy conservation approach is included in ESI. † The flat PDMS surface produced A = 1.24 AE 0.01 for all the fluids combined, a value very consistent with data collected by Laan et al 7 Elsewhere, two recent studies 49,50 viscous losses. Nevertheless the fit parameters are much more consistent with values for Newtonian fluids than those determined using the alternative approach (eqn ( 6)).…”
Section: Spread Factorsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…However, Yokoyama et al 47 found that blood, which exhibits strong shear-thinning character, had almost the same spreading and splashing behavior as a Newtonian fluid droplet with a μ value close to μ ∞ . Recently, Balzan et al 48 conducted an experimental work to show that the maximum spreading diameter of shearthinning droplets depends on the viscosity at high shear rates. All of these works suggest that the shear-thinning property may alter the dynamic wetting process, possibly due to the different levels of viscous dissipation with varying viscosities.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When a shear-thinning fluid droplet impinges on a solid surface, the shear viscosity varies continuously between the μ 0 and the μ ∞ , associated with shear deformation. Many efforts have been devoted to understanding the wetting process of impact droplets with shear-thinning fluids. , An and Lee showed that the shear-thinning droplets on solid surfaces tend to have a more rapid shape evolution than the droplets with the same μ 0 . However, Yokoyama et al found that blood, which exhibits strong shear-thinning character, had almost the same spreading and splashing behavior as a Newtonian fluid droplet with a μ value close to μ ∞ .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the pioneering work of Worthington, droplet impact on solid surfaces has attracted extensive attention, as it commonly occurs in nature and is critical for various industrial applications such as food production, agriculture, spray coating, lab-on-a-chip, and three-dimensional (3D) printing. In many industrial applications such as self-cleaning, anti-icing, and antierosion, various types of water-repellent surfaces with minimum droplet impact contact time have been developed. Recently, studies have been focused on innovative methods for modifying solid surfaces to reduce contact time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%