2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2016.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Driving safety field theory modeling and its application in pre-collision warning system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
56
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 182 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to [16], if all vehicles are ICVs, i.e. the MPR is 1, and there is a central controller that coordinate the braking force of every vehicle in real-time, we could define a metric to quantify the severity of a collision:…”
Section: ) Cooperative Collision Avoidance Algorithm Based On Minimumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to [16], if all vehicles are ICVs, i.e. the MPR is 1, and there is a central controller that coordinate the braking force of every vehicle in real-time, we could define a metric to quantify the severity of a collision:…”
Section: ) Cooperative Collision Avoidance Algorithm Based On Minimumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the inverse reinforcement learning method was employed to learn the risk assessment model from driving demonstrations [14]. Some complex mathematic models were proposed considering dynamic features, such as the safety field model [19]. These models firstly defined the relationship between features and SA models and then calibrated the parameters of the function using realistic driving data [20].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the pressure field was simulated to visualize its impact on vehicle movement [19]. These studies helped to quantify the impact of road infrastructures on drivers, and such impact was also known as driving safety field proposed by Wang et al [20,21]. In driving safety field, road infrastructures were the sources of static potential field that had an important role in collision warning algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%