2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2019.11.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Driving safety efficiency benchmarking using smartphone data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
16
0
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
16
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding, although expected, because drivers differ in driving aggressiveness, hints that the identification of a driver’s observation time—before forming his driving profile—should be preceded by an analysis of the aggressiveness profile. Results indicate that the most aggressive drivers (i.e., the ones with a larger number of harsh events per km) tend to converge at a faster rate than the less aggressive drivers, confirming the results of the literature [ 9 , 15 ]. More specifically, it is noticed that, on average, more aggressive drivers tend to converge (for all metrics and their volatility) at around 80 trips, while less aggressive drivers converge at around 100 trips.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This finding, although expected, because drivers differ in driving aggressiveness, hints that the identification of a driver’s observation time—before forming his driving profile—should be preceded by an analysis of the aggressiveness profile. Results indicate that the most aggressive drivers (i.e., the ones with a larger number of harsh events per km) tend to converge at a faster rate than the less aggressive drivers, confirming the results of the literature [ 9 , 15 ]. More specifically, it is noticed that, on average, more aggressive drivers tend to converge (for all metrics and their volatility) at around 80 trips, while less aggressive drivers converge at around 100 trips.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Among the factors that relate to humans’ actions and reactions on the road, aggressiveness and distraction in driving behavior are of particular interest, as they become easier to monitor and study using the latest advances in technology [ 7 , 8 , 9 ]. More specifically, literature related to monitoring driving behavior using modern technology has centered to three attributes describing unsafe driving behavior, namely mobile phone usage, driving above the speed limit (speeding) and harsh driving [ 10 , 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…total duration, total distance driven per trip, driving duration, risky hours driving per trip, harsh accelerations per 100 km, harsh braking per 100 km, speeding duration/driving duration, average speeding, average total speed, average driving speed and mobile phone usage duration/driving duration) are captured through a specially developed smartphone application provided by OSeven Telematics and transmitted to a back-end platform. Taking into account that recently published studies ( Papadimitriou et al, 2019 ; Stavrakaki et al, 2020 ; Tselentis et al, 2019 ) have used the aforementioned indicators in order to estimate driving behavior, these can form a representative set of indicators to reflect the effect of COVID-19.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The type of road also affect the risk of crashing as urban, regional, and rural roads present different conditions [11]. The time also increase the risk for young people as their are more likely to crash at night and over the weekend [12], as we can see those risk factors plays an important role, thus measuring the safety efficiency of the drivers is very important [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%